Menu
GeneBe

rs35029074

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.6323G>A(p.Arg2108His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00126 in 1,608,966 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R2108C) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0024 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:35

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0720
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0033438802).
BP6
Variant 13-32340678-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32340678-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 38037.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32340678-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr13-32340678-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00114 (1661/1456724) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00688 (227/33010). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00614. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 757 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 46. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.6323G>A p.Arg2108His missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.6323G>A p.Arg2108His missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00243
AC:
370
AN:
152124
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00647
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00100
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00116
AC:
286
AN:
245876
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.000992
AC XY:
132
AN XY:
133104
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00825
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000960
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000683
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000465
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000504
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00114
AC:
1661
AN:
1456724
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
46
AF XY:
0.00104
AC XY:
757
AN XY:
724506
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00688
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000991
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000471
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000188
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00155
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00244
AC:
371
AN:
152242
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00223
AC XY:
166
AN XY:
74438
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00648
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00100
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.000960
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00291
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00135
AC:
5
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00130
AC:
5
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00681
AC:
30
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00151
AC:
13
ExAC
AF:
0.00127
AC:
154
EpiCase
AF:
0.00136
EpiControl
AF:
0.00172

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:35
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:11
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPathway GenomicsJul 24, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 08, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Oct 10, 2012- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtJul 28, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylJan 02, 2014- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Aug 10, 2015IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000000000000372 -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganApr 21, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
not specified Benign:10
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 11, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ClinVar: Ben by expert panel -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Arg2108His variant has been reported in the literature in 14/19788 proband chromosomes in individuals with breast cancer, prostate cancer and cutaneous melanoma (Borg_2010, Caux-Moncoutier_2009, Caux-Moncoutier_2011,de Sanjose_2003, Diez_2003, Gomez-Garcia_2005, Kote-Jarai_2011, Lindor_2012, Monnerat_2007). It was not, however, found in any of the 100 control chromosomes tested. It is listed in the dbSNP database as coming from a "clinical source" (ID#:rs35029074) with a global minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.001 (1000 Genomes), increasing the likelihood that this is a low frequency benign variant. The variant was also identified in the LOVD (X2), UMD (X68), Exome server, BIC (X127) and BOCs databases; in the latter database it was classified as a benign variant with an ACMG 5 designation. In the UMD database, this variant has been identified in nine individuals with a second pathogenic in BRCA1 [c.6078dup (p.Arg2027LysfsX22), c.1440_1441delCA (p.Ile481SerfsX32)] and BRCA2 [c.IVS16+6T>C (c.4986+6T>C), c.442_4357del (p.Glu149TyrfsX2), c.4485_4675del (p.Ser1496GlyfsX14), c.2679_2682delGAAA (p.Lys893AsnfsX106)], thereby increasing the likelihood that this variant does not have clinical significance. This residue is not conserved in mammals and the variant amino acid Histidine (His) is present in chicken at this position, increasing the likelihood that an alteration to this residue may not have functional significance. Computational analyses (PolyPhen, SIFT, AlignGVGD) do not predict any effect on the protein function, however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 11, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer AgencyApr 18, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 23, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoAug 07, 2018- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 09, 2015- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsDec 08, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Mar 23, 2020- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicFeb 20, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenFeb 01, 2024BRCA2: BP4, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesApr 18, 2022- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJan 05, 2016- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 08, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchCSER _CC_NCGL, University of WashingtonJun 01, 2014- -
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 23, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.072
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.28
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.17
Cadd
Benign
9.2
Dann
Benign
0.95
Eigen
Benign
-0.80
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.79
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.15
N
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0033
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.89
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.21
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.24
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.20
Sift
Benign
0.15
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.15
T;T
Vest4
0.32
MVP
0.83
MPC
0.027
ClinPred
0.0025
T
GERP RS
2.8
gMVP
0.21

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35029074; hg19: chr13-32914815; COSMIC: COSV104430671; API