rs35029175
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_001377540.1(SLMAP):c.1991A>G(p.Gln664Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00113 in 1,612,582 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q664H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001377540.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Brugada syndromeInheritance: Unknown, AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLMAP | NM_001377540.1 | c.1991A>G | p.Gln664Arg | missense_variant | Exon 20 of 25 | ENST00000671191.1 | NP_001364469.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLMAP | ENST00000671191.1 | c.1991A>G | p.Gln664Arg | missense_variant | Exon 20 of 25 | NM_001377540.1 | ENSP00000499458.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000624 AC: 95AN: 152248Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000549 AC: 137AN: 249686 AF XY: 0.000547 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00118 AC: 1729AN: 1460216Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00109 AC XY: 789AN XY: 726114 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000623 AC: 95AN: 152366Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000483 AC XY: 36AN XY: 74516 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Brugada syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at