rs35092963

Positions:

• chr14-101986601-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_Moderate BP6 BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):​c.2376C>T​(p.Cys792=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000682 in 1,613,118 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000068 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: DYNC1H1 NM_001376.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3 B:4
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.0180

Genes affected

DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
• BP6: Variant 14-101986601-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-101986601-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 516911.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=3}.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.018 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000678 (99/1461050) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.000347 (2/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000221. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 50 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 11 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DYNC1H1	NM_001376.5	c.2376C>T	p.Cys792=	synonymous_variant	8/78	ENST00000360184.10	NP_001367.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DYNC1H1	ENST00000360184.10	c.2376C>T	p.Cys792=	synonymous_variant	8/78	1	NM_001376.5	ENSP00000348965	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11 AN: 152068 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000724

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000208

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000735

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000479

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000915 AC: 23 AN: 251388 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000103 AC XY: 14 AN XY: 135864

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.000294

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000967

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000163

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000678 AC: 99 AN: 1461050 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000688 AC XY: 50 AN XY: 726632

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.000313

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000585

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.0000663

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11 AN: 152068 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000539 AC XY: 4 AN XY: 74278

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000724

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.0000655

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000735

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000479

Alfa AF: 0.000181 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.0000793

EpiCase AF: 0.0000545

EpiControl AF: 0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3 Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 22, 2024	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O;C3281202:Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 13;C5780022:Autosomal dominant childhood-onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy without contractures Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Mar 30, 2021

DYNC1H1 NM_001376.4 exon 8 p.Cys792= (c.2376C>T): This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in 9/30776 South Asian alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/rs35092963). This variant is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:516911). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are limited or unavailable. Of note, this variant is a silent variant and does not change the amino acid, reducing the probability that this variant is disease causing. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Jun 16, 2017

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Apr 26, 2017

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

DYNC1H1-related disorder Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Jul 11, 2019

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.45
CADD	Benign	2.2
DANN	Benign	0.62
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.8

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35092963; hg19: chr14-102452938;