rs35118262

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM5BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_020975.6(RET):​c.833C>A​(p.Thr278Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000694 in 1,612,876 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T278P) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00085 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00068 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

RET
NM_020975.6 missense

Scores

4
14

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:17O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.42
Variant links:
Genes affected
RET (HGNC:9967): (ret proto-oncogene) This gene encodes a transmembrane receptor and member of the tyrosine protein kinase family of proteins. Binding of ligands such as GDNF (glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor) and other related proteins to the encoded receptor stimulates receptor dimerization and activation of downstream signaling pathways that play a role in cell differentiation, growth, migration and survival. The encoded receptor is important in development of the nervous system, and the development of organs and tissues derived from the neural crest. This proto-oncogene can undergo oncogenic activation through both cytogenetic rearrangement and activating point mutations. Mutations in this gene are associated with Hirschsprung disease and central hypoventilation syndrome and have been identified in patients with renal agenesis. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chrnull-null-null-null is described in UniProt as null.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0058131814).
BP6
Variant 10-43105159-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-43105159-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 41846.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-43105159-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-43105159-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000847 (129/152272) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0225 (116/5148). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0192. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 80 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 13 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
RETNM_020975.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.833C>A p.Thr278Asn missense_variant 4/20 ENST00000355710.8 NP_066124.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RETENST00000355710.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.833C>A p.Thr278Asn missense_variant 4/205 NM_020975.6 ENSP00000347942 P4P07949-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000848
AC:
129
AN:
152154
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0225
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00224
AC:
551
AN:
246048
Hom.:
7
AF XY:
0.00224
AC XY:
301
AN XY:
134132
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000580
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0283
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000589
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000100
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000495
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000678
AC:
990
AN:
1460604
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.000721
AC XY:
524
AN XY:
726682
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0207
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000812
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000270
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00108
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000847
AC:
129
AN:
152272
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00107
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
74454
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0225
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000953
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00124
ExAC
AF:
0.00202
AC:
245
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0110
AC:
38
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:17Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4Other:1
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoAug 28, 2022The frequency of this variant in the general population (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Computational tools predict this amino acid change may be benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesOct 13, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 25, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: 2.7% East Asian population ExAC, LB by Ambry 2014 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalFeb 06, 2024- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesMay 25, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2024RET: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 23, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24845513, 24728327, 17009072, 20981092, 26152202, 21251878, 25122427, 22703879, 24618965, 22174939, 22640420, 19443294, 27153395, 26332594, 22377709, 29192238, 28775167, 31180159) -
Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterreference populationSoonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical CenterMar 18, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthSep 20, 2022- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 27, 2017This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4May 18, 2021- -
Pheochromocytoma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Renal hypodysplasia/aplasia 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Multiple endocrine neoplasia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.17
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.35
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.26
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Benign
0.97
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.48
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.16
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.013
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.88
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.87
D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0058
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.57
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.6
M;.;M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.45
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.0
N;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.18
Sift
Benign
0.035
D;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.19
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0010
B;.;B
Vest4
0.32
MVP
0.76
MPC
0.87
ClinPred
0.054
T
GERP RS
3.8
Varity_R
0.48
gMVP
0.88

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35118262; hg19: chr10-43600607; COSMIC: COSV60688812; COSMIC: COSV60688812; API