rs35154632
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001042413.2(GLIS3):c.938G>C(p.Gly313Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00913 in 1,614,206 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 74 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001042413.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0106 AC: 1619AN: 152202Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00733 AC: 1843AN: 251470Hom.: 14 AF XY: 0.00726 AC XY: 987AN XY: 135910
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00897 AC: 13116AN: 1461886Hom.: 66 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.00880 AC XY: 6399AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0107 AC: 1628AN: 152320Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0112 AC XY: 836AN XY: 74490
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32425884, 31287502) -
GLIS3: BS1, BS2 -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
- -
Neonatal diabetes mellitus with congenital hypothyroidism Benign:2
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
- -
Monogenic diabetes Benign:1
ACMG criteria: BA1 (1.63% in gnomAD African, 0.7% overall), BS2 (17 homozygotes in gnomAD)=benign (REVEL 0.206 +PP3/7 predictors + BP4/3 predictors: conflicting evidence, not using) -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at