rs35214083

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_182894.3(VSX2):​c.299C>A​(p.Pro100Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000823 in 1,577,558 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P100P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0042 ( 12 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00047 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

VSX2
NM_182894.3 missense

Scores

1
6
11

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.30
Variant links:
Genes affected
VSX2 (HGNC:1975): (visual system homeobox 2) This gene encodes a homeobox protein originally described as a retina-specific transcription factor. Mutations in this gene are associated with microphthalmia, cataracts and iris abnormalities. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006032586).
BP6
Variant 14-74239860-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-74239860-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 167839.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=3, Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00416 (634/152306) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0147 (610/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0137. There are 12 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 295 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 12 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
VSX2NM_182894.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.299C>A p.Pro100Gln missense_variant 1/5 ENST00000261980.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
VSX2ENST00000261980.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.299C>A p.Pro100Gln missense_variant 1/51 NM_182894.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00413
AC:
628
AN:
152188
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0146
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000957
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000989
AC:
182
AN:
184000
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.000839
AC XY:
84
AN XY:
100112
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0146
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000896
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000805
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000395
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000205
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000467
AC:
665
AN:
1425252
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000415
AC XY:
293
AN XY:
705448
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0161
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000868
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000184
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000639
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00129
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00416
AC:
634
AN:
152306
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00396
AC XY:
295
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0147
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000947
Alfa
AF:
0.000591
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00476
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00618
AC:
26
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000843
AC:
99
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Isolated microphthalmia 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Microphthalmia, isolated, with coloboma 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Apr 24, 2014- -
Microphthalmia Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 30, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.25
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.13
CADD
Benign
23
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.35
T
Eigen
Benign
0.18
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.29
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0060
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.22
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.4
L
MutationTaster
Benign
0.99
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.61
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.1
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.35
Sift
Benign
0.076
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.30
T
Polyphen
0.85
P
Vest4
0.31
MVP
0.82
MPC
0.50
ClinPred
0.012
T
GERP RS
4.8
Varity_R
0.19
gMVP
0.42

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35214083; hg19: chr14-74706563; COSMIC: COSV99029621; API