rs35307405
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001143992.2(WRAP53):c.807C>T(p.Arg269=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000659 in 1,614,244 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0036 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00035 ( 5 hom. )
Consequence
WRAP53
NM_001143992.2 synonymous
NM_001143992.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -8.57
Genes affected
WRAP53 (HGNC:25522): (WD repeat containing antisense to TP53) This gene encodes an essential component of the telomerase holoenzyme complex, a ribonucleoprotein complex required for telomere synthesis. This protein is enriched in Cajal bodies, nuclear sites of RNP processing that are important for telomerase function. It interacts with dyskerin, TERT and TERC, other components of active telomerase, and with small Cajal body RNAs (scaRNAs), which are involved in modifying splicing RNAs. This mRNA also functions as a p53 antisense transcript, that regulates endogenous p53 mRNA levels and further induction of p53 protein by targeting the 5' untranslated region of p53 mRNA. Alternatively spliced transcript variants which differ only in the 5' UTR have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
BP6
Variant 17-7701534-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-7701534-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 619289.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-8.57 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00364 (554/152364) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0124 (514/41578). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0115. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 273 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRAP53 | NM_001143992.2 | c.807C>T | p.Arg269= | synonymous_variant | 6/11 | ENST00000396463.7 | |
WRAP53 | NM_001143990.2 | c.807C>T | p.Arg269= | synonymous_variant | 6/11 | ||
WRAP53 | NM_001143991.2 | c.807C>T | p.Arg269= | synonymous_variant | 6/11 | ||
WRAP53 | NM_018081.2 | c.807C>T | p.Arg269= | synonymous_variant | 5/10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRAP53 | ENST00000396463.7 | c.807C>T | p.Arg269= | synonymous_variant | 6/11 | 1 | NM_001143992.2 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00355 AC: 540AN: 152246Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
540
AN:
152246
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000776 AC: 195AN: 251442Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000412 AC XY: 56AN XY: 135898
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
195
AN:
251442
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
56
AN XY:
135898
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000348 AC: 509AN: 1461880Hom.: 5 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000276 AC XY: 201AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
509
AN:
1461880
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
201
AN XY:
727240
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00364 AC: 554AN: 152364Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00366 AC XY: 273AN XY: 74506
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
554
AN:
152364
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
273
AN XY:
74506
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal recessive 3 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Johns Hopkins Genomics, Johns Hopkins University | Feb 12, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 17, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
Dyskeratosis congenita Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 01, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at