rs35335654
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):āc.5170A>Gā(p.Ile1724Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000349 in 1,603,398 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I1724T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.5170A>G | p.Ile1724Val | missense_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.5170A>G | p.Ile1724Val | missense_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000197 AC: 30AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000454 AC: 11AN: 242492Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000381 AC XY: 5AN XY: 131312
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000179 AC: 26AN: 1451176Hom.: 0 Cov.: 44 AF XY: 0.0000180 AC XY: 13AN XY: 721834
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000197 AC: 30AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000188 AC XY: 14AN XY: 74374
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Apr 08, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 20, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 16, 2015 | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | Dec 23, 2003 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | May 01, 2012 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 10, 2021 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.5170A>G (p.Ile1724Val) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.5e-05 in 242492 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00071 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. In addition, this variant was found in 5/2559 African individuals over age 70 with no history of cancer. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.5170A>G in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported (BRCA1 c.211A>G , p.Arg71Gly; BRCA1 c.470_471delCT , p.Ser157X; BRCA1 943ins10), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Apr 29, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jan 07, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 23, 2020 | In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25348012) - |
Ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | 3DMed Clinical Laboratory Inc | Jan 02, 2018 | - - |
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 24, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at