rs35365413

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 4P and 8B. PM1PM2BP4_StrongBS1

The NM_019098.5(CNGB3):ā€‹c.1405T>Gā€‹(p.Tyr469Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000431 in 1,614,036 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0024 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00022 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CNGB3
NM_019098.5 missense

Scores

6
10
3

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:2B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.11
Variant links:
Genes affected
CNGB3 (HGNC:2153): (cyclic nucleotide gated channel subunit beta 3) This gene encodes the beta subunit of a cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel. The encoded beta subunit appears to play a role in modulation of channel function in cone photoreceptors. This heterotetrameric channel is necessary for sensory transduction, and mutations in this gene have been associated with achromatopsia 3, progressive cone dystrophy, and juvenile macular degeneration, also known as Stargardt Disease. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PM1
In a topological_domain Extracellular (size 65) in uniprot entity CNGB3_HUMAN there are 9 pathogenic changes around while only 1 benign (90%) in NM_019098.5
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.041806072).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00244 (371/152284) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00835 (347/41570). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00762. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 175 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CNGB3NM_019098.5 linkc.1405T>G p.Tyr469Asp missense_variant 12/18 ENST00000320005.6 NP_061971.3 Q9NQW8-1
CNGB3XM_011517138.3 linkc.991T>G p.Tyr331Asp missense_variant 10/16 XP_011515440.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CNGB3ENST00000320005.6 linkc.1405T>G p.Tyr469Asp missense_variant 12/181 NM_019098.5 ENSP00000316605.5 Q9NQW8-1
CNGB3ENST00000681546.1 linkn.1225T>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 7/13
CNGB3ENST00000681746.1 linkn.1405T>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 12/19 ENSP00000505959.1 A0A5J6DSN8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00244
AC:
371
AN:
152166
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00837
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000959
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000589
AC:
148
AN:
251070
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000487
AC XY:
66
AN XY:
135662
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00824
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000318
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000222
AC:
324
AN:
1461752
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000190
AC XY:
138
AN XY:
727180
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00810
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
8.99e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000497
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00244
AC:
371
AN:
152284
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00235
AC XY:
175
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00835
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000949
Alfa
AF:
0.000329
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00279
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00794
AC:
35
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000782
AC:
95

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:2Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 11, 2023Variant summary: CNGB3 c.1405T>G (p.Tyr469Asp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00059 in 251070 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0082 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.64 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CNGB3 causing Achromatopsia phenotype (0.005), suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. c.1405T>G has been reported in the literature in settings of limited gene panel testing in heterozygous individuals with no reported second variant affected with achromatopsia (e.g. Mayer_2017, Weisschuh_2020), in at least one compound heterozygous individual affected with macular degeneration (e.g. Sun_2020, Nishiguchi_2005), or by WES in a heterozygous individual affected with severe Retinitis Pigmentosa (e.g. Ganapathi_2022). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Achromatopsia. One publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, suggesting the variant may enhance the intrinsic (ligand independent) gating properties of CNG channels in vitro, however, additional evidence is necessary to allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect in disease (e.g. Meighan_2015). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 35672425, 28795510, 26106334, 15712225, 32913385, 31544997). Five submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, classifying the variant as benign (n=2), likely benign (n=1), uncertain significance (n=1), or likely pathogenic (n=1). Based on the conflicting evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 22, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 05, 2024The p.Tyr469Asp variant in CNGB3 is classified as likely benign because it has been identified in 0.8% (347/41448) of African chromosomes, including 1 homozygote by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BS1. -
Achromatopsia 3 Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedresearchMolecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute for Ophthalmic ResearchMar 27, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylSep 19, 2017- -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenFeb 01, 2024CNGB3: BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Severe early-childhood-onset retinal dystrophy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyOMIMMar 01, 2005- -
Achromatopsia Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Jan 08, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.80
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.038
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.29
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.48
T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.36
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.29
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.94
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.27
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.042
T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
0.85
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
2.9
M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.61
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-8.7
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.74
Sift
Benign
0.055
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.060
T
Polyphen
0.97
D
Vest4
0.92
MVP
0.98
MPC
0.17
ClinPred
0.12
T
GERP RS
4.8
Varity_R
0.41
gMVP
0.79

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35365413; hg19: chr8-87641222; API