rs35451920

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_198525.3(KIF7):c.2271C>T(p.Ala757Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00157 in 1,610,644 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 35 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0084 ( 18 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00086 ( 17 hom. )

Consequence

KIF7
NM_198525.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.54

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

KIF7 (HGNC:30497): (kinesin family member 7) This gene encodes a cilia-associated protein belonging to the kinesin family. This protein plays a role in the sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway through the regulation of GLI transcription factors. It functions as a negative regulator of the SHH pathway by preventing inappropriate activation of GLI2 in the absence of ligand, and as a positive regulator by preventing the processing of GLI3 into its repressor form. Mutations in this gene have been associated with various ciliopathies. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]

KIF7 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

acrocallosal syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
neurodevelopmental disorder
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
hydrolethalus syndrome 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
hydrolethalus syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, Al-Gazali type
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
orofaciodigital syndrome type 6
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

KIF7 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).

BP6

Variant 15-89642326-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-89642326-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 129411.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.54 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00839 (1277/152118) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0292 (1211/41520). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0278. There are 18 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 600 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 18 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
KIF7	NM_198525.3 link	c.2271C>T	p.Ala757Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 19	ENST00000394412.8	NP_940927.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
KIF7	ENST00000394412.8 link	c.2271C>T	p.Ala757Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 19	5	NM_198525.3	ENSP00000377934.3
KIF7	ENST00000696512.1 link	c.2394C>T	p.Ala798Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 19			ENSP00000512678.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00837

AC:

1272

AN:

152000

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0291

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00315

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00431

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00210

AC:

511

AN:

243070

AF XY:

0.00154

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0274

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00167

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000128

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00168

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000861

AC:

1256

AN:

1458526

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000812

AC XY:

589

AN XY:

725546

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0273

AC:

913

AN:

33422

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00191

AC:

AN:

44544

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26080

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39632

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000373

AC:

AN:

85832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52160

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00262

AC:

AN:

5342

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000603

AC:

AN:

1111290

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00239

AC:

144

AN:

60224

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

151

227

302

378

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

114

152

190

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00839

AC:

1277

AN:

152118

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00807

AC XY:

600

AN XY:

74362

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0292

AC:

1211

AN:

41520

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00314

AC:

AN:

15274

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3464

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5156

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000416

AC:

AN:

4812

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10588

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000103

AC:

AN:

67988

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00426

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

126

189

252

315

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00439

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00934

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Aug 12, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 20, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Acrocallosal syndrome

Benign:2

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.82

CADD

Benign

0.060

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.73

PhyloP100

-4.5

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.6

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over