rs35488756
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000168.6(GLI3):āc.1393G>Cā(p.Gly465Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00393 in 1,613,320 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0033 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.0040 ( 24 hom. )
Consequence
GLI3
NM_000168.6 missense
NM_000168.6 missense
Scores
3
4
12
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.06
Genes affected
GLI3 (HGNC:4319): (GLI family zinc finger 3) This gene encodes a protein which belongs to the C2H2-type zinc finger proteins subclass of the Gli family. They are characterized as DNA-binding transcription factors and are mediators of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling. The protein encoded by this gene localizes in the cytoplasm and activates patched Drosophila homolog (PTCH) gene expression. It is also thought to play a role during embryogenesis. Mutations in this gene have been associated with several diseases, including Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome, Pallister-Hall syndrome, preaxial polydactyly type IV, and postaxial polydactyly types A1 and B. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00919497).
BP6
Variant 7-42023572-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-42023572-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 255422.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-42023572-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00399 (5832/1461436) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.0229 (132/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0197. There are 24 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 3025 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 501 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLI3 | NM_000168.6 | c.1393G>C | p.Gly465Arg | missense_variant | 10/15 | ENST00000395925.8 | NP_000159.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLI3 | ENST00000395925.8 | c.1393G>C | p.Gly465Arg | missense_variant | 10/15 | 5 | NM_000168.6 | ENSP00000379258 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00330 AC: 501AN: 151766Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
501
AN:
151766
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00393 AC: 988AN: 251492Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00412 AC XY: 560AN XY: 135918
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
988
AN:
251492
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
560
AN XY:
135918
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00399 AC: 5832AN: 1461436Hom.: 24 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00416 AC XY: 3025AN XY: 727050
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5832
AN:
1461436
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3025
AN XY:
727050
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00330 AC: 501AN: 151884Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00317 AC XY: 235AN XY: 74222
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
501
AN:
151884
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
235
AN XY:
74222
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
8
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
9
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
49
ExAC
AF:
AC:
534
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | GLI3: BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Sep 29, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 14, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 09, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Pallister-Hall syndrome;C0265306:Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Polydactyly Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Pallister-Hall syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Benign
N;.
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
T;.
Polyphen
B;.
Vest4
MutPred
Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.0971);.;
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at