Menu
GeneBe

rs35502109

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_004168.4(SDHA):c.1623G>A(p.Lys541=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00218 in 1,612,024 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0022 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

SDHA
NM_004168.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.230
Variant links:
Genes affected
SDHA (HGNC:10680): (succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A) This gene encodes a major catalytic subunit of succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, a complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits and is localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of mitochondrial respiratory chain deficiency known as Leigh Syndrome. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 3q29. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).
BP6
Variant 5-251063-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-251063-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 252905.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=5, Likely_benign=6, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr5-251063-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.23 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00215 (328/152330) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.0049 (75/15308). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00401. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 172 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SDHANM_004168.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1623G>A p.Lys541= synonymous_variant 12/15 ENST00000264932.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SDHAENST00000264932.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1623G>A p.Lys541= synonymous_variant 12/151 NM_004168.4 P1P31040-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00215
AC:
327
AN:
152212
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00491
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000827
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00207
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00259
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00383
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00230
AC:
578
AN:
251140
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00238
AC XY:
323
AN XY:
135720
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000554
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00254
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00327
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00114
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00311
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00522
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00218
AC:
3188
AN:
1459694
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00230
AC XY:
1667
AN XY:
726156
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00132
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00262
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00291
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00102
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00223
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00357
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00215
AC:
328
AN:
152330
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00231
AC XY:
172
AN XY:
74500
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000746
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00490
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000828
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00207
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00259
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00379
Alfa
AF:
0.00280
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00218
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00398
EpiControl
AF:
0.00367

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2024SDHA: BP4, BP7, BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 11, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17298551, 23666964) -
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoSep 15, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 29, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jan 27, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 23, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Paragangliomas 5;C5700310:Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Paragangliomas 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.49
Cadd
Benign
6.2
Dann
Benign
0.32
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35502109; hg19: chr5-251178; API