rs35572355

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BS2BS1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.2494G>A (p.Val832Met) variant has an allele frequency of 0.00175 (0.175%, 33/18,868 alleles) in the East Asian subpopulation of the gnomAD cohort (BS1). This variant has been observed in >10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS1, BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA157969/MONDO:0007648/007

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000085 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel P:3U:3B:12O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.13

Variant links:

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

CDH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BS1

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

BS2

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5 link	c.2494G>A	p.Val832Met	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 16	ENST00000261769.10	NP_004351.1	P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317184.2 link	c.2311G>A	p.Val771Met	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 15		NP_001304113.1	P12830-2B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317185.2 link	c.946G>A	p.Val316Met	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 16		NP_001304114.1	P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1	NM_001317186.2 link	c.529G>A	p.Val177Met	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 15		NP_001304115.1	P12830B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10 link	c.2494G>A	p.Val832Met	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 16	1	NM_004360.5	ENSP00000261769.4		P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000854

AC:

AN:

152144

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00135

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000167

AC:

AN:

251488

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000228

AC XY:

AN XY:

135918

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00169

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000527

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000153

AC:

223

AN:

1461892

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000165

AC XY:

120

AN XY:

727248

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000383

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00431

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000174

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000279

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000497

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000854

AC:

AN:

152262

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000107

AC XY:

AN XY:

74432

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000722

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00135

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000208

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000529

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000239

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Pathogenic:3Uncertain:3Benign:12Other:1

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma

Pathogenic:2Uncertain:1Benign:3

Aug 07, 2018

Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 22, 2023

Mendelics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2022

European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BS1; BS2 (PMID: 30311375) -

Jan 28, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 18, 2016

Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical Center

Significance: Likely pathogenic

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Oct 10, 2002

OMIM

Significance: Pathogenic

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Aug 01, 2018

GeneKor MSA

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 21, 2017

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 11, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Jan 16, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified

Benign:3Other:1

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 24, 2024

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 18, 2020

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: CDH1 c.2494G>A (p.Val832Met) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Cadherin, cytoplasmic domain of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00022 in 253888 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0017 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 60 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. c.2494G>A, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (Yabuta_2002, Kim_2017), Breast Cancer (Schrader_2011, Rummel_2017, Siraj_2017), Lynch Syndrome (Yurgelun_2015), and Pancreatic Cancer (Shindo_2017, Ohmoto_2015). A publication, Yabuta_2002, reports the variant to segregate with disease in a HDGC family. Furthermore, a tumor obtained from a patient with this variant harbored a CDH1 promoter hypermethylation as a second hit leading to somatic loss of heterozygosity (Oliveira_2009). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. At-least two co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been observed (Siraj_2017-FANCI c.2737C>T, p.Q913X; our laboratory-BRCA2 c.5576_5579delTTAA, p.Ile1859fs), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Multiple functional studies showed no significant effect of this variant on cell mobility and cell invasion (Suriano_2003), interaction with alpha/beta catenin (Bajpai_2008), cell surface expression, EGFR signaling, and beta catenin binding (Mateaus_2009, Yabuta_2002, Curtis_2007). In addition, Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) variant curation expert panel (VCEP) recently classified this variant as benign (Lee_2018). Ten clinical diagnostic laboratories and one expert panel (ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel) have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple submitters reported the variant with conflicting assessments (likely benign, n=3, benign, n=1). Several submitters cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Neoplasm of stomach

Pathogenic:1

Jun 01, 2014

CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington

Significance: Likely pathogenic

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Uncertain:1

May 01, 2019

Cancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

CDH1-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 21, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not provided

Benign:1

Sep 13, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 12216071, 26759166, 28004449, 26692440, 20373070, 29050249, 16924464, 19268661, 22850631, 24055113, 24728327, 17668349, 12944922, 17261850, 16600987, 25388006, 25856671, 25637381, 17545690, 20233471, 26150395, 20921021, 16787116, 28503720, 14500541, 19269290, 26049741, 25980754, 22470475, 19017792, 29231860, 28975465, 28767289, 29522266, 29929997, 29752822, 16112667, 21989054, 19247957, 31159747, 31892987, 32426482) -

CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Aug 10, 2023

ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel

Significance: Benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

The c.2494G>A (p.Val832Met) variant has an allele frequency of 0.00175 (0.175%, 33/18,868 alleles) in the East Asian subpopulation of the gnomAD cohort (BS1). This variant has been observed in >10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS1, BS2. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.93

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.10

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.37

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.55

D;T;.

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.97

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.92

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

0.99

D;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.10

MetaRNN

Benign

0.091

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.53

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

3.4

M;.;.

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.86

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.5

N;.;N

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.74

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

D;.;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0020

D;D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;.;.

Vest4

0.69

MVP

0.94

MPC

0.91

ClinPred

0.35

GERP RS

6.0

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.64

gMVP

0.80

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over