rs35576928
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_002761.3(PRM1):c.102G>T(p.Arg34Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00824 in 1,614,194 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 95 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R34K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002761.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRM1 | ENST00000312511.4 | c.102G>T | p.Arg34Ser | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 2 | 1 | NM_002761.3 | ENSP00000310515.3 | ||
| RMI2 | ENST00000572173.1 | c.-515-14079C>A | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | 1 | ENSP00000461206.1 | ||||
| RMI2 | ENST00000573910.1 | n.160+31359C>A | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 1 | 3 | |||||
| RMI2 | ENST00000649869.1 | n.152+31359C>A | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00777 AC: 1183AN: 152218Hom.: 16 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00875 AC: 2199AN: 251444 AF XY: 0.00873 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00829 AC: 12114AN: 1461858Hom.: 79 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00804 AC XY: 5849AN XY: 727230 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00777 AC: 1183AN: 152336Hom.: 16 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00879 AC XY: 655AN XY: 74492 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at