Menu
GeneBe

rs35593170

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000368.5(TSC1):​c.3324C>T​(p.Gly1108=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0045 in 1,614,196 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 439 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0073 ( 48 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0042 ( 391 hom. )

Consequence

TSC1
NM_000368.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0670
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 9-132896406-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132896406-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 49024.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-132896406-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.067 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0588 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TSC1NM_000368.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.3324C>T p.Gly1108= synonymous_variant 23/23 ENST00000298552.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TSC1ENST00000298552.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.3324C>T p.Gly1108= synonymous_variant 23/231 NM_000368.5 P4Q92574-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00729
AC:
1109
AN:
152186
Hom.:
49
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00162
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0621
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00251
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000514
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00908
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0184
AC:
4618
AN:
251428
Hom.:
323
AF XY:
0.0143
AC XY:
1940
AN XY:
135896
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00172
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.123
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00304
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00108
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00254
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000879
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0130
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00421
AC:
6156
AN:
1461892
Hom.:
391
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00368
AC XY:
2674
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000836
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.118
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00406
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00232
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000221
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00336
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00729
AC:
1110
AN:
152304
Hom.:
48
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00855
AC XY:
637
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00161
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0621
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00251
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000514
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00899
Alfa
AF:
0.00217
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.0128
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00462
AC:
16
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingUnidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría GarrahanJul 15, 2024This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 20% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy. Number of patients: 19. Only high quality variants are reported. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 16, 2020- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 22, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJun 16, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 14, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Tuberous sclerosis 1 Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabNov 07, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingDivision of Genomic Medicine, Department of Advanced Medicine, Medical Research Institute, Kanazawa Medical UniversityJul 10, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthAug 17, 2022- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 26, 2016Variant summary: The TSC1 c.3324C>T (p.Gly1108Gly) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict the variant to result in the creation of a cyrpitc splice donor site. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 1690/121388 control chromosomes (132 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the Latino subpopulation at a frequency of 0.1302506 (1507/11570). This frequency greatly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic TSC1 variant (0.000025), strong evidence that this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of Latino origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 11, 2023- -
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:1Other:1
not provided, no classification providedcurationTuberous sclerosis database (TSC1)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 25, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Malignant tumor of urinary bladder Other:1
not provided, no classification providedcurationTuberous sclerosis database (TSC1)-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
2.2
DANN
Benign
0.51

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35593170; hg19: chr9-135771793; COSMIC: COSV53764062; COSMIC: COSV53764062; API