rs35606263

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.214G>A (p.Asp72Asn) missense variant has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.048% in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in over 300 probands not meeting HDGC phenotype criteria (BS2; SCV000210893.13, SCV000186096.8, SCV000166549.12). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as Likely Benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: BS2. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 06/26/2023) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA294297/MONDO:0100488/007

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000047 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

8
11

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:7B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.63

Publications

15 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]
CDH1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • blepharocheilodontic syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
  • cleft soft palate
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • orofacial cleft 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • blepharocheilodontic syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

BS2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkc.214G>A p.Asp72Asn missense_variant Exon 3 of 16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1 P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkc.214G>A p.Asp72Asn missense_variant Exon 3 of 15 NP_001304113.1 P12830-2B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkc.-1402G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 3 of 16 NP_001304114.1 P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkc.-1606G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 3 of 15 NP_001304115.1 P12830B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkc.214G>A p.Asp72Asn missense_variant Exon 3 of 16 1 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769.4 P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000658
AC:
10
AN:
152018
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000115
AC:
29
AN:
251402
AF XY:
0.000125
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000463
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000440
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000472
AC:
69
AN:
1461874
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000495
AC XY:
36
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000119
AC:
4
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000514
AC:
23
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000459
AC:
12
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000347
AC:
2
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000180
AC:
20
AN:
1111996
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000132
AC:
8
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
11
15
19
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000723
AC:
11
AN:
152136
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000807
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74368
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000723
AC:
3
AN:
41502
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000262
AC:
4
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10578
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000588
AC:
4
AN:
68008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
2
3
4
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000191
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000136
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000233
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.0000824
AC:
10
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:9
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:4Benign:1
Aug 01, 2022
European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BS2_Supporting (PMID: 30311375) -

Mar 06, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -

Jul 02, 2018
Mendelics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 22, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 12, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:2
Feb 25, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; Observed in individuals with lung cancer and in 1/11,241 controls but not in the associated breast cancer cases (Momozawa 2018, Santeufemia 2019); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30287823, 30979070, 31159747, 31784482) -

-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The CDH1 p.Asp72Asn variant was not identified in 14102 proband chromosomes from individuals or families with breast cancer but was present in 4 of 22482 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0009) from healthy individuals (Momozawa 2018). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs35606263) as "With Uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, GeneDx and five other submitters), and LOVD 3.0 (2x as VUS). The variant was identified in control databases in 29 of 277070 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0001 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 3 of 24020 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), Latino in 17 of 34418 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), European in 6 of 126588 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005), Ashkenazi Jewish in 3 of 10148 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003); it was not observed in the Other, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Asp72 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -

May 12, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 09, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:3
Jul 26, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Dec 09, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 25, 2024
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2018
GeneKor MSA
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Jan 22, 2024
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: CDH1 c.214G>A (p.Asp72Asn) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Cadherin prodomain (IPR014868) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.9e-05 in 1607036 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00045 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database (v4 dataset). The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 16-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Latino origin. The variant, c.214G>A, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast cancer (Tsaousis_2019, Dorling_2021), but it was also found in several controls (Momozawa_2018, Dorling_2021, Okawa_2023). In addition, this variant was also reported in 3/7325 European American women, who were older than age 70, and have never had cancer (in the FLOSSIES database). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: NO_PMID, 19011631, 30287823, 31159747, 33471991, 36243179). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 136064). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Aug 03, 2023
ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

The c.214G>A (p.Asp72Asn) missense variant has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.048% in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in over 300 probands not meeting HDGC phenotype criteria (BS2; SCV000210893.13, SCV000186096.8, SCV000166549.12). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as Likely Benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: BS2. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 06/26/2023) -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Feb 15, 2024
German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

According to the ACMG gene specific: CDH1 criteria we chose this criterion: BS2 (strong benign): ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: >300 probands/families not meeting HDGC criteria -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.52
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.34
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.28
T;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.42
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.39
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.95
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.87
D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.047
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.49
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.70
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.3
M;.;.;.;M
PhyloP100
4.6
PrimateAI
Benign
0.48
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.2
N;.;.;.;D
REVEL
Benign
0.26
Sift
Benign
0.17
T;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.12
T;D;T;D;T
Polyphen
0.99
D;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.40
MVP
0.86
MPC
0.63
ClinPred
0.42
T
GERP RS
4.5
Varity_R
0.11
gMVP
0.49
Mutation Taster
=82/18
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35606263; hg19: chr16-68835623; COSMIC: COSV55740490; API