rs35683768

Variant names:

• chr2-178802255-C-A
• rs35683768
• NM_001267550.2:c.178G>T

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr2-178802255-C-A
• chr2-178802255-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.178G>T​(p.Asp60Tyr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0104 in 1,614,044 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 229 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. D60D) has been classified as Likely benign.

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.026 (92 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0087 (137 hom.)
• Consequence: TTN NM_001267550.2 missense
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:25
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 6.17

Genes affected

TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0039069057).
• BP6: Variant 2-178802255-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178802255-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 46687.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178802255-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178802255-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BA1: GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0654 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TTN	NM_001267550.2	c.178G>T	p.Asp60Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 363	ENST00000589042.5	NP_001254479.2
TTN	NM_133379.5	c.178G>T	p.Asp60Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 46	ENST00000360870.10	NP_596870.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TTN	ENST00000589042.5	c.178G>T	p.Asp60Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 363	5	NM_001267550.2	ENSP00000467141.1
TTN	ENST00000360870.10	c.178G>T	p.Asp60Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 46	5	NM_133379.5	ENSP00000354117.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0260 AC: 3961 AN: 152088 Hom.: 93 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0674

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.0257

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00490

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.0104

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.0135

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.0182

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00633

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00585

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.0249

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0134 AC: 3373 AN: 251320 Hom.: 61 AF XY: 0.0126 AC XY: 1715 AN XY: 135810

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0705

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.0113

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00486

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00899

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0136

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.0179

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00656

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.0114

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00872 AC: 12742 AN: 1461838 Hom.: 137 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00881 AC XY: 6404 AN XY: 727224

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0681

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0121

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00486

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00423

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0140

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0156

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00608

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.0119

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0261 AC: 3971 AN: 152206 Hom.: 92 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0268 AC XY: 1995 AN XY: 74410

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0674

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.0257

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00490

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.0102

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.0131

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.0182

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00585

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.0246

Alfa AF: 0.00878 Hom.: 48

Bravo AF: 0.0287

TwinsUK AF: 0.00701 AC: 26

ALSPAC AF: 0.00571 AC: 22

ESP6500AA AF: 0.0647 AC: 285

ESP6500EA AF: 0.00593 AC: 51

ExAC AF: 0.0139 AC: 1686

Asia WGS AF: 0.0130 AC: 45 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.00698

EpiControl AF: 0.00830

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:25

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:12

Aug 15, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 11, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 11, 2020

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 24, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

6.5% (243/3738) of Afr Amer chrom in ESP -

Jun 24, 2013

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 19, 2024

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2

Sep 10, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2

Sep 10, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2

Nov 06, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2

Sep 10, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2

Sep 10, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1

Jan 16, 2013

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Uncertain	0.40
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.39	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.27
CADD	Uncertain	25
DANN	Benign	0.95
Eigen	Pathogenic	0.79
Eigen_PC	Pathogenic	0.79
FATHMM_MKL	Pathogenic	0.97	D
LIST_S2	Pathogenic	0.98	D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN	Benign	0.0039	T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM	Benign	-0.91	T
PrimateAI	Uncertain	0.66	T
PROVEAN	Pathogenic	-5.6	D;D;.;.;D;D;.;D
REVEL	Uncertain	0.34
Sift	Uncertain	0.0020	D;D;.;.;D;D;.;D
Sift4G	Pathogenic	0.0010	.;.;.;.;.;.;.;D
Polyphen		0.99, 1.0	.;.;.;D;.;.;D;D
Vest4		0.30
MPC		0.40
ClinPred		0.035	T
GERP RS		5.7

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35683768; hg19: chr2-179666982;