rs35746964

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_203447.4(DOCK8):c.1017G>A(p.Pro339Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000679 in 1,614,002 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0036 ( 4 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00038 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

DOCK8
NM_203447.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.38

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

DOCK8 (HGNC:19191): (dedicator of cytokinesis 8) This gene encodes a member of the DOCK180 family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors interact with Rho GTPases and are components of intracellular signaling networks. Mutations in this gene result in the autosomal recessive form of the hyper-IgE syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described.[provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]

DOCK8 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

combined immunodeficiency due to DOCK8 deficiency
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disability
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
complex neurodevelopmental disorder
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

DOCK8 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).

BP6

Variant 9-328144-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-328144-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 379115.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.38 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00357 (543/152236) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0126 (523/41518). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0117. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 227 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DOCK8	NM_203447.4 link	c.1017G>A	p.Pro339Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 48	ENST00000432829.7	NP_982272.2	Q8NF50-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DOCK8	ENST00000432829.7 link	c.1017G>A	p.Pro339Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 48	1	NM_203447.4	ENSP00000394888.3		Q8NF50-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00353

AC:

537

AN:

152118

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0125

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000721

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000832

AC:

209

AN:

251118

AF XY:

0.000538

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000203

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000881

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000378

AC:

553

AN:

1461766

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000342

AC XY:

249

AN XY:

727174

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0127

AC:

425

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000335

AC:

AN:

44718

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39682

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000812

AC:

AN:

86246

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53404

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000531

AC:

AN:

1111956

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000745

AC:

AN:

60386

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.468

Heterozygous variant carriers

119

149

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00357

AC:

543

AN:

152236

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00305

AC XY:

227

AN XY:

74434

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0126

AC:

523

AN:

41518

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000720

AC:

AN:

15280

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00284

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.490

Heterozygous variant carriers

116

145

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00176

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00445

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00231

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Dec 01, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

DOCK8: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

not specified

Benign:1

Jul 29, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Combined immunodeficiency due to DOCK8 deficiency

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Benign:1

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.72

CADD

Benign

3.7

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.65

PhyloP100

-4.4

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over