rs35763277
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_182961.4(SYNE1):āc.22516A>Gā(p.Ser7506Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0153 in 1,613,628 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 268 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.011 ( 19 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.016 ( 249 hom. )
Consequence
SYNE1
NM_182961.4 missense
NM_182961.4 missense
Scores
3
9
6
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.89
Genes affected
SYNE1 (HGNC:17089): (spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope protein 1) This gene encodes a spectrin repeat containing protein expressed in skeletal and smooth muscle, and peripheral blood lymphocytes, that localizes to the nuclear membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 8, also referred to as autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 1 or recessive ataxia of Beauce. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), SYNE1. . Gene score misZ -0.29069 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 3.2909 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type, autosomal recessive myogenic arthrogryposis multiplex congenita, Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant, arthrogryposis multiplex congenita 3, myogenic type, autosomal dominant Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009470105).
BP6
Variant 6-152211567-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-152211567-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 130422.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-152211567-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr6-152211567-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0112 (1704/152292) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0161 (1096/68024). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0153. There are 19 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 851 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1704 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNE1 | NM_182961.4 | c.22516A>G | p.Ser7506Gly | missense_variant | 124/146 | ENST00000367255.10 | NP_892006.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNE1 | ENST00000367255.10 | c.22516A>G | p.Ser7506Gly | missense_variant | 124/146 | 1 | NM_182961.4 | ENSP00000356224 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0112 AC: 1704AN: 152176Hom.: 19 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1704
AN:
152176
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0127 AC: 3183AN: 250946Hom.: 44 AF XY: 0.0123 AC XY: 1668AN XY: 135612
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
3183
AN:
250946
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1668
AN XY:
135612
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0158 AC: 23061AN: 1461336Hom.: 249 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0153 AC XY: 11092AN XY: 726984
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
23061
AN:
1461336
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
11092
AN XY:
726984
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0112 AC: 1704AN: 152292Hom.: 19 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0114 AC XY: 851AN XY: 74462
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1704
AN:
152292
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
851
AN XY:
74462
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
50
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
79
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
18
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
147
ExAC
AF:
AC:
1660
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 12, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 20, 2020 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type;C2751807:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
D;.;T;T;T
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;.;D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;.;T;T;T
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;T;D;D
Polyphen
D;.;.;.;.
Vest4
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at