rs35774078

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_019892.6(INPP5E):​c.1359C>T​(p.Pro453Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0313 in 1,550,870 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,311 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.052 ( 382 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.029 ( 929 hom. )

Consequence

INPP5E
NM_019892.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -6.71

Publications

11 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
INPP5E (HGNC:21474): (inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase E) The protein encoded by this gene is an inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3) 5-phosphatase. InsP3 5-phosphatases hydrolyze Ins(1,4,5)P3, which mobilizes intracellular calcium and acts as a second messenger mediating cell responses to various stimulation. Studies of the mouse counterpart suggest that this protein may hydrolyze phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate and phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate on the cytoplasmic Golgi membrane and thereby regulate Golgi-vesicular trafficking. Mutations in this gene cause Joubert syndrome; a clinically and genetically heterogenous group of disorders characterized by midbrain-hindbrain malformation and various associated ciliopathies that include retinal dystrophy, nephronophthisis, liver fibrosis and polydactyly. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
INPP5E Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Joubert syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • MORM syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Orphanet
  • COACH syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Joubert syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Joubert syndrome with ocular defect
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.95).
BP6
Variant 9-136432507-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-136432507-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 129267.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-6.71 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.11 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
INPP5ENM_019892.6 linkc.1359C>T p.Pro453Pro synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 10 ENST00000371712.4 NP_063945.2 Q9NRR6-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
INPP5EENST00000371712.4 linkc.1359C>T p.Pro453Pro synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 10 1 NM_019892.6 ENSP00000360777.3 Q9NRR6-1
INPP5EENST00000676019.1 linkc.1257C>T p.Pro419Pro synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 10 ENSP00000501984.1 Q9NRR6-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0519
AC:
7900
AN:
152176
Hom.:
381
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.112
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0497
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.112
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00519
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00890
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00358
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0264
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0636
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0322
AC:
5100
AN:
158226
AF XY:
0.0302
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.114
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0315
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.109
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00699
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00404
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0294
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0478
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0291
AC:
40640
AN:
1398576
Hom.:
929
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0287
AC XY:
19787
AN XY:
690040
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.119
AC:
3766
AN:
31700
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0335
AC:
1201
AN:
35882
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.109
AC:
2747
AN:
25162
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00469
AC:
169
AN:
36058
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00946
AC:
750
AN:
79314
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00551
AC:
265
AN:
48066
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0969
AC:
550
AN:
5674
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0266
AC:
28668
AN:
1078728
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0435
AC:
2524
AN:
57992
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.457
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1988
3975
5963
7950
9938
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1180
2360
3540
4720
5900
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0520
AC:
7914
AN:
152294
Hom.:
382
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0510
AC XY:
3799
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.112
AC:
4664
AN:
41542
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0496
AC:
759
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.112
AC:
390
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00501
AC:
26
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00890
AC:
43
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00358
AC:
38
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.133
AC:
39
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0264
AC:
1795
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0634
AC:
134
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
381
762
1142
1523
1904
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
84
168
252
336
420
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0432
Hom.:
122
Bravo
AF:
0.0601
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0190
AC:
67
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Apr 01, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Joubert syndrome Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Joubert syndrome 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.95
CADD
Benign
0.25
DANN
Benign
0.69
PhyloP100
-6.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35774078; hg19: chr9-139326959; COSMIC: COSV65496370; COSMIC: COSV65496370; API