rs35795890
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 3P and 20B. PM1PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000304636.9(COL3A1):c.1804C>A(p.Pro602Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00556 in 1,613,986 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 35 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P602A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000304636.9 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL3A1 | NM_000090.4 | c.1804C>A | p.Pro602Thr | missense_variant | 25/51 | ENST00000304636.9 | NP_000081.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL3A1 | ENST00000304636.9 | c.1804C>A | p.Pro602Thr | missense_variant | 25/51 | 1 | NM_000090.4 | ENSP00000304408 | P1 | |
COL3A1 | ENST00000450867.2 | c.1705C>A | p.Pro569Thr | missense_variant | 24/50 | 1 | ENSP00000415346 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00514 AC: 781AN: 152010Hom.: 5 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00455 AC: 1144AN: 251446Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00482 AC XY: 655AN XY: 135898
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00561 AC: 8200AN: 1461858Hom.: 30 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00558 AC XY: 4056AN XY: 727230
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00513 AC: 781AN: 152128Hom.: 5 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00481 AC XY: 358AN XY: 74370
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 29, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Feb 21, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | COL3A1: BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, type 4 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Jul 22, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 31, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | May 17, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jun 12, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 26, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Mar 12, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at