rs35813871

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.2432C>T​(p.Thr811Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.21 in 1,614,008 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39,606 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.17 ( 2675 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.21 ( 36931 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

1
8
7

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:22

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.94

Publications

27 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • dilated cardiomyopathy 1G
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
  • early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P
  • TTN-related myopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
  • tibial muscular dystrophy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet
  • autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • autosomal recessive centronuclear myopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • childhood-onset progressive contractures-limb-girdle weakness-muscle dystrophy syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • congenital myopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary skeletal muscle disorder
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0015586615).
BP6
Variant 2-178785681-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178785681-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 46805.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.227 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.2432C>T p.Thr811Ile missense_variant Exon 15 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.2432C>T p.Thr811Ile missense_variant Exon 15 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.172
AC:
26159
AN:
152086
Hom.:
2676
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.107
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.113
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.170
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.325
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000770
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0738
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.124
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.291
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.230
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.220
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.170
AC:
42633
AN:
251288
AF XY:
0.173
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.104
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.118
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.329
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000381
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.133
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.237
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.209
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.214
AC:
312429
AN:
1461804
Hom.:
36931
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.211
AC XY:
153616
AN XY:
727208
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0998
AC:
3342
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.124
AC:
5560
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.334
AC:
8732
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000554
AC:
22
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0832
AC:
7176
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.137
AC:
7316
AN:
53412
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.245
AC:
1412
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.239
AC:
266188
AN:
1111946
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.210
AC:
12681
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15386
30772
46158
61544
76930
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
8826
17652
26478
35304
44130
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.172
AC:
26151
AN:
152204
Hom.:
2675
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.165
AC XY:
12292
AN XY:
74408
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.107
AC:
4452
AN:
41542
American (AMR)
AF:
0.170
AC:
2601
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.325
AC:
1129
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000772
AC:
4
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0730
AC:
352
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.124
AC:
1313
AN:
10604
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.289
AC:
85
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.230
AC:
15653
AN:
67974
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.218
AC:
459
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1110
2220
3331
4441
5551
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
274
548
822
1096
1370
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.208
Hom.:
8186
Bravo
AF:
0.174
TwinsUK
AF:
0.247
AC:
915
ALSPAC
AF:
0.246
AC:
947
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.102
AC:
450
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.235
AC:
2017
ExAC
AF:
0.169
AC:
20517
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0460
AC:
163
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.253
EpiControl
AF:
0.257

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:22
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:10
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Aug 08, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 31, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Feb 07, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.56
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.33
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.10
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Benign
0.94
Eigen
Uncertain
0.58
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.63
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.95
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.88
D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0016
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
PhyloP100
5.9
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.61
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.2
D;D;.;.;D;D;.;D
REVEL
Benign
0.27
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;.;.;D;D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0030
.;.;.;.;.;.;.;D
Polyphen
1.0, 1.0
.;.;.;D;.;.;D;D
Vest4
0.20
MPC
0.29
ClinPred
0.061
T
GERP RS
5.5
Mutation Taster
=80/20
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35813871; hg19: chr2-179650408; COSMIC: COSV60066380; COSMIC: COSV60066380; API