rs35837280

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_198525.3(KIF7):​c.2481C>T​(p.Asn827=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00201 in 1,612,390 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 62 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 38 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 24 hom. )

Consequence

KIF7
NM_198525.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0120
Variant links:
Genes affected
KIF7 (HGNC:30497): (kinesin family member 7) This gene encodes a cilia-associated protein belonging to the kinesin family. This protein plays a role in the sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway through the regulation of GLI transcription factors. It functions as a negative regulator of the SHH pathway by preventing inappropriate activation of GLI2 in the absence of ligand, and as a positive regulator by preventing the processing of GLI3 into its repressor form. Mutations in this gene have been associated with various ciliopathies. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).
BP6
Variant 15-89633797-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-89633797-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129412.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-89633797-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.012 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0108 (1648/152340) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0377 (1567/41584). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0361. There are 38 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 823 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 38 AR,Digenic gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
KIF7NM_198525.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2481C>T p.Asn827= synonymous_variant 12/19 ENST00000394412.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
KIF7ENST00000394412.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.2481C>T p.Asn827= synonymous_variant 12/195 NM_198525.3 P2
KIF7ENST00000696512.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.2604C>T p.Asn868= synonymous_variant 12/19 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0108
AC:
1645
AN:
152222
Hom.:
38
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0377
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00236
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00670
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00275
AC:
687
AN:
249818
Hom.:
12
AF XY:
0.00200
AC XY:
271
AN XY:
135218
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0371
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00107
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000653
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000494
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000229
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000818
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00109
AC:
1591
AN:
1460050
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000920
AC XY:
668
AN XY:
726430
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0378
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00136
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000353
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000927
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000194
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00194
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0108
AC:
1648
AN:
152340
Hom.:
38
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0110
AC XY:
823
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0377
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00235
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00663
Alfa
AF:
0.00304
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.0118
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 23, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Acrocallosal syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 25, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.57
CADD
Benign
0.82
DANN
Benign
0.93

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35837280; hg19: chr15-90177028; COSMIC: COSV67999683; COSMIC: COSV67999683; API