rs35837280

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_198525.3(KIF7):c.2481C>T(p.Asn827Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00201 in 1,612,390 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 62 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 38 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 24 hom. )

Consequence

KIF7
NM_198525.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0120

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

KIF7 (HGNC:30497): (kinesin family member 7) This gene encodes a cilia-associated protein belonging to the kinesin family. This protein plays a role in the sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway through the regulation of GLI transcription factors. It functions as a negative regulator of the SHH pathway by preventing inappropriate activation of GLI2 in the absence of ligand, and as a positive regulator by preventing the processing of GLI3 into its repressor form. Mutations in this gene have been associated with various ciliopathies. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]

KIF7 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

acrocallosal syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
neurodevelopmental disorder
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
hydrolethalus syndrome 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
hydrolethalus syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, Al-Gazali type
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
orofaciodigital syndrome type 6
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

KIF7 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).

BP6

Variant 15-89633797-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-89633797-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 129412.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.012 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0108 (1648/152340) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0377 (1567/41584). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0361. There are 38 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 823 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 38 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
KIF7	NM_198525.3 link	c.2481C>T	p.Asn827Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 12 of 19	ENST00000394412.8	NP_940927.2	Q2M1P5

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
KIF7	ENST00000394412.8 link	c.2481C>T	p.Asn827Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 12 of 19	5	NM_198525.3	ENSP00000377934.3		Q2M1P5
KIF7	ENST00000696512.1 link	c.2604C>T	p.Asn868Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 12 of 19			ENSP00000512678.1		A0A8Q3SIQ8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0108

AC:

1645

AN:

152222

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0377

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00236

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000385

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000397

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00670

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00275

AC:

687

AN:

249818

AF XY:

0.00200

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0371

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00107

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000494

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000229

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000818

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00109

AC:

1591

AN:

1460050

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000920

AC XY:

668

AN XY:

726430

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0378

AC:

1266

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00136

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000353

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000927

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000194

AC:

AN:

51632

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000103

AC:

114

AN:

1111982

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00194

AC:

117

AN:

60374

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.479

Heterozygous variant carriers

103

206

308

411

514

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

138

184

230

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0108

AC:

1648

AN:

152340

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0110

AC XY:

823

AN XY:

74498

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0377

AC:

1567

AN:

41584

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00235

AC:

AN:

15302

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000386

AC:

AN:

5180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000414

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000397

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00663

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.501

Heterozygous variant carriers

166

249

332

415

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00401

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0118

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Apr 23, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Acrocallosal syndrome

Benign:2

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.57

CADD

Benign

0.82

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.93

PhyloP100

-0.012

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over