rs35871586

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_005502.4(ABCA1):​c.3159T>G​(p.Val1053Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00999 in 1,614,208 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 101 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0073 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.010 ( 98 hom. )

Consequence

ABCA1
NM_005502.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.148

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ABCA1 (HGNC:29): (ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 1) The membrane-associated protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intracellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the ABC1 subfamily. Members of the ABC1 subfamily comprise the only major ABC subfamily found exclusively in multicellular eukaryotes. With cholesterol as its substrate, this protein functions as a cholesteral efflux pump in the cellular lipid removal pathway. Mutations in both alleles of this gene cause Tangier disease and familial high-density lipoprotein (HDL) deficiency. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2019]
ABCA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hypoalphalipoproteinemia, primary, 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Tangier disease
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
  • apolipoprotein A-I deficiency
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 9-104819668-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-104819668-A-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 364421.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.148 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00735 (1119/152314) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0118 (801/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0111. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 505 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ABCA1NM_005502.4 linkc.3159T>G p.Val1053Val synonymous_variant Exon 22 of 50 ENST00000374736.8 NP_005493.2 O95477B7XCW9B2RUU2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ABCA1ENST00000374736.8 linkc.3159T>G p.Val1053Val synonymous_variant Exon 22 of 50 1 NM_005502.4 ENSP00000363868.3 O95477
ABCA1ENST00000678995.1 linkc.3159T>G p.Val1053Val synonymous_variant Exon 22 of 50 ENSP00000504612.1 A0A7I2V5U0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00735
AC:
1119
AN:
152196
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00208
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00510
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00331
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0105
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00813
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00750
AC:
1887
AN:
251452
AF XY:
0.00746
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00178
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00961
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0103
AC:
15012
AN:
1461894
Hom.:
98
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0100
AC XY:
7273
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00143
AC:
48
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00434
AC:
194
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00168
AC:
44
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000756
AC:
3
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00428
AC:
369
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0116
AC:
619
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00104
AC:
6
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0118
AC:
13172
AN:
1112012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00922
AC:
557
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
946
1892
2838
3784
4730
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
498
996
1494
1992
2490
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00735
AC:
1119
AN:
152314
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00678
AC XY:
505
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00207
AC:
86
AN:
41558
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00510
AC:
78
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00331
AC:
16
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0105
AC:
112
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0118
AC:
801
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00804
AC:
17
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
62
124
187
249
311
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00872
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00648
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0101
EpiControl
AF:
0.0108

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

May 30, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The ABCA1 c.3159T>G (p.Val1053Val) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 918/121410 control chromosomes (including 6 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0075612, which is approximately 605 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic ABCA1 variant (0.0000125), suggesting this variant is a benign polymorphism. One internal sample carrying this variant also carries another deleterious variant PCSK9 p.Tyr142X further supporting for benign outcome. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -

Jul 10, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ABCA1: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -

Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Sep 10, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Hypoalphalipoproteinemia, primary, 1 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Tangier disease Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
6.6
DANN
Benign
0.74
PhyloP100
0.15
Mutation Taster
=83/17
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35871586; hg19: chr9-107581949; API