rs35874463
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_005902.4(SMAD3):c.508A>G(p.Ile170Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0491 in 1,614,100 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,257 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. I170I) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005902.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMAD3 | NM_005902.4 | c.508A>G | p.Ile170Val | missense_variant | 3/9 | ENST00000327367.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMAD3 | ENST00000327367.9 | c.508A>G | p.Ile170Val | missense_variant | 3/9 | 1 | NM_005902.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0342 AC: 5203AN: 152160Hom.: 117 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0396 AC: 9960AN: 251386Hom.: 275 AF XY: 0.0411 AC XY: 5587AN XY: 135876
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0506 AC: 74008AN: 1461822Hom.: 2140 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0506 AC XY: 36798AN XY: 727214
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0341 AC: 5198AN: 152278Hom.: 117 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0335 AC XY: 2492AN XY: 74456
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:9
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 04, 2013 | Ile170Val in exon 3 of SMAD3: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 5.5% (470/8598) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http: //evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs35874463). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 08, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 05, 2012 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | Nov 30, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 23, 2019 | Variant summary: SMAD3 c.508A>G (p.Ile170Val) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.04 in 251386 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 275 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 1056 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in SMAD3 causing Aortopathy phenotype (3.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.508A>G in individuals affected with Aortopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign (n=5)/likely benign (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 19, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | May 09, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 25, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Aneurysm-osteoarthritis syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 05, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Loeys-Dietz syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Jul 07, 2022 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Thoracic aortic aneurysm Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Cohesion Phenomics | Sep 23, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at