rs35886055
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000057.4(BLM):āc.419A>Gā(p.Glu140Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00169 in 1,614,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 56 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000057.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | NM_000057.4 | c.419A>G | p.Glu140Gly | missense_variant | 3/22 | ENST00000355112.8 | NP_000048.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | ENST00000355112.8 | c.419A>G | p.Glu140Gly | missense_variant | 3/22 | 1 | NM_000057.4 | ENSP00000347232 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00882 AC: 1342AN: 152196Hom.: 27 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00230 AC: 577AN: 251314Hom.: 7 AF XY: 0.00183 AC XY: 248AN XY: 135852
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000950 AC: 1389AN: 1461848Hom.: 29 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000854 AC XY: 621AN XY: 727222
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00883 AC: 1345AN: 152314Hom.: 27 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00881 AC XY: 656AN XY: 74470
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Bloom syndrome Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Jun 13, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Sep 15, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 31, 2016 | Variant summary: The BLM c.419A>G (p.Glu140Gly) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 3/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 351/121252 control chromosomes (2 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0317352 (327/10304). This frequency is about 9 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BLM variant (0.0035355), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, the variant is classified as benign. - |
not specified Benign:2Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 25, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jul 09, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 29, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at