Menu
GeneBe

rs35886055

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000057.4(BLM):c.419A>G(p.Glu140Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00169 in 1,614,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 56 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. E140E) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0088 ( 27 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00095 ( 29 hom. )

Consequence

BLM
NM_000057.4 missense

Scores

5
13

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.36
Variant links:
Genes affected
BLM (HGNC:1058): (BLM RecQ like helicase) The Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth deficiency, microcephaly and immunodeficiency among others. It is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding DNA helicase RecQ protein on chromosome 15q26. This Bloom-associated helicase unwinds a variety of DNA substrates including Holliday junction, and is involved in several pathways contributing to the maintenance of genome stability. Identification of pathogenic Bloom variants is required for heterozygote testing in at-risk families. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004220754).
BP6
Variant 15-90749687-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-90749687-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 133708.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-90749687-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00883 (1345/152314) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0308 (1282/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0294. There are 27 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 656 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 27 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BLMNM_000057.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.419A>G p.Glu140Gly missense_variant 3/22 ENST00000355112.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BLMENST00000355112.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.419A>G p.Glu140Gly missense_variant 3/221 NM_000057.4 P2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00882
AC:
1342
AN:
152196
Hom.:
27
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0309
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00573
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00230
AC:
577
AN:
251314
Hom.:
7
AF XY:
0.00183
AC XY:
248
AN XY:
135852
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0318
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000980
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000950
AC:
1389
AN:
1461848
Hom.:
29
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000854
AC XY:
621
AN XY:
727222
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0346
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00148
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000580
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000558
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00156
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00883
AC:
1345
AN:
152314
Hom.:
27
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00881
AC XY:
656
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0308
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00261
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00567
Alfa
AF:
0.00155
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00965
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0330
AC:
145
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00290
AC:
352
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00318
AC:
11
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Bloom syndrome Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Jun 13, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
not specified Benign:2Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJul 09, 2021- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 25, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsSep 15, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 31, 2016Variant summary: The BLM c.419A>G (p.Glu140Gly) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 3/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 351/121252 control chromosomes (2 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0317352 (327/10304). This frequency is about 9 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BLM variant (0.0035355), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, the variant is classified as benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 29, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.098
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.41
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.33
Cadd
Benign
20
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.085
T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.25
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.37
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.74
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0042
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.3
M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.85
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.38
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.8
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.071
Sift
Benign
0.26
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.49
T;T
Polyphen
0.68
P;.
Vest4
0.21
MVP
0.82
MPC
0.33
ClinPred
0.024
T
GERP RS
6.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.097
gMVP
0.11

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35886055; hg19: chr15-91292917; COSMIC: COSV104665711; COSMIC: COSV104665711; API