rs35897746

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_018136.5(ASPM):c.2307A>G(p.Ala769Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0026 in 1,614,116 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 88 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 46 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 42 hom. )

Consequence

ASPM
NM_018136.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.338

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ASPM (HGNC:19048): (assembly factor for spindle microtubules) This gene is the human ortholog of the Drosophila melanogaster 'abnormal spindle' gene (asp), which is essential for normal mitotic spindle function in embryonic neuroblasts. Studies in mouse also suggest a role of this gene in mitotic spindle regulation, with a preferential role in regulating neurogenesis. Mutations in this gene are associated with microcephaly primary type 5. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, May 2011]

ASPM Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

microcephaly 5, primary, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
autosomal recessive primary microcephaly
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen

ASPM links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).

BP6

Variant 1-197133462-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-197133462-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 157794.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.338 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0134 (2040/152294) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0458 (1902/41554). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0441. There are 46 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 971 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 46 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ASPM	NM_018136.5 link	c.2307A>G	p.Ala769Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 28	ENST00000367409.9	NP_060606.3	Q8IZT6-1B3KWI2
ASPM	NM_001206846.2 link	c.2307A>G	p.Ala769Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 27		NP_001193775.1	Q8IZT6-2B3KWI2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ASPM	ENST00000367409.9 link	c.2307A>G	p.Ala769Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 28	1	NM_018136.5	ENSP00000356379.4		Q8IZT6-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0134

AC:

2036

AN:

152176

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0458

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00635

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00955

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000309

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00813

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00364

AC:

916

AN:

251358

AF XY:

0.00269

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0471

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00278

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000308

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00261

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00148

AC:

2161

AN:

1461822

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00130

AC XY:

946

AN XY:

727210

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0459

AC:

1535

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00293

AC:

131

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39680

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000928

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000374

AC:

AN:

53416

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00191

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000221

AC:

246

AN:

1111984

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00378

AC:

228

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.467

Heterozygous variant carriers

108

215

323

430

538

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

108

162

216

270

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0134

AC:

2040

AN:

152294

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0130

AC XY:

971

AN XY:

74492

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0458

AC:

1902

AN:

41554

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00634

AC:

AN:

15296

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.0103

AC:

AN:

292

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000309

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00804

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.498

Heterozygous variant carriers

191

286

382

477

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

120

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00516

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0144

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000327

EpiControl

AF:

0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 08, 2019

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Sep 18, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Feb 08, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Microcephaly 5, primary, autosomal recessive

Benign:2

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Apr 11, 2023

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.65

CADD

Benign

0.78

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.49

PhyloP100

-0.34

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over