rs35942532

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_004525.3(LRP2):​c.12725A>G​(p.Asp4242Gly) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00251 in 1,614,180 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0017 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0026 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

LRP2
NM_004525.3 missense

Scores

1
8
10

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.27
Variant links:
Genes affected
LRP2 (HGNC:6694): (LDL receptor related protein 2) The protein encoded by this gene, low density lipoprotein-related protein 2 (LRP2) or megalin, is a multi-ligand endocytic receptor that is expressed in many different tissues but primarily in absorptive epithilial tissues such as the kidney. This glycoprotein has a large amino-terminal extracellular domain, a single transmembrane domain, and a short carboxy-terminal cytoplasmic tail. The extracellular ligand-binding-domains bind diverse macromolecules including albumin, apolipoproteins B and E, and lipoprotein lipase. The LRP2 protein is critical for the reuptake of numerous ligands, including lipoproteins, sterols, vitamin-binding proteins, and hormones. This protein also has a role in cell-signaling; extracellular ligands include parathyroid horomones and the morphogen sonic hedgehog while cytosolic ligands include MAP kinase scaffold proteins and JNK interacting proteins. Recycling of this membrane receptor is regulated by phosphorylation of its cytoplasmic domain. Mutations in this gene cause Donnai-Barrow syndrome (DBS) and facio-oculoacoustico-renal syndrome (FOAR).[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012433708).
BP6
Variant 2-169146825-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-169146825-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 211390.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=4}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00166 (253/152316) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00259 (176/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00227. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 122 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
LRP2NM_004525.3 linkc.12725A>G p.Asp4242Gly missense_variant Exon 69 of 79 ENST00000649046.1 NP_004516.2 P98164Q7Z5C0Q7Z5C1
LRP2XM_011511183.4 linkc.12596A>G p.Asp4199Gly missense_variant Exon 68 of 78 XP_011509485.1
LRP2XM_047444340.1 linkc.11801A>G p.Asp3934Gly missense_variant Exon 69 of 79 XP_047300296.1
LRP2XM_011511184.3 linkc.10436A>G p.Asp3479Gly missense_variant Exon 54 of 64 XP_011509486.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LRP2ENST00000649046.1 linkc.12725A>G p.Asp4242Gly missense_variant Exon 69 of 79 NM_004525.3 ENSP00000496870.1 P98164
LRP2ENST00000649153.1 linkn.3623A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 21 of 30 ENSP00000497617.1 A0A3B3IT64
LRP2ENST00000650252.1 linkn.*436A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 14 of 24 ENSP00000496887.1 A0A3B3IRR0
LRP2ENST00000650252.1 linkn.*436A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 14 of 24 ENSP00000496887.1 A0A3B3IRR0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00166
AC:
253
AN:
152198
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0175
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00386
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00259
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00179
AC:
451
AN:
251358
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00172
AC XY:
233
AN XY:
135852
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000665
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00420
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00284
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00260
AC:
3805
AN:
1461864
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00253
AC XY:
1843
AN XY:
727230
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000388
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000805
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000765
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000243
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00485
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00301
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00205
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00166
AC:
253
AN:
152316
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00164
AC XY:
122
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00386
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00259
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.00213
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00147
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00378
AC:
14
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00311
AC:
12
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00314
AC:
27
ExAC
AF:
0.00164
AC:
199
EpiCase
AF:
0.00251
EpiControl
AF:
0.00243

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Donnai-Barrow syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 01, 2021
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Jul 17, 2020
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Jan 13, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

LRP2: BS2 -

not specified Uncertain:1
Aug 08, 2014
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

LRP2-related disorder Benign:1
Feb 24, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.30
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.21
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.070
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.27
T;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.31
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.40
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
.;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.085
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.012
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.027
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.5
L;L
PrimateAI
Benign
0.33
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.6
.;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.60
Sift
Benign
0.15
.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.19
.;T
Polyphen
0.99
D;D
Vest4
0.26
MVP
0.62
MPC
0.96
ClinPred
0.027
T
GERP RS
5.7
Varity_R
0.53
gMVP
0.90

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35942532; hg19: chr2-170003335; COSMIC: COSV104378847; API