rs35963491

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):ā€‹c.5224T>Cā€‹(p.Leu1742=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00137 in 1,614,170 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0075 ( 8 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00073 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.01
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 5-13844884-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13844884-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 226600.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.01 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00749 (1140/152286) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0257 (1070/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0245. There are 8 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 525 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 8 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
DNAH5NM_001369.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.5224T>C p.Leu1742= synonymous_variant 32/79 ENST00000265104.5 NP_001360.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNAH5ENST00000265104.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.5224T>C p.Leu1742= synonymous_variant 32/791 NM_001369.3 ENSP00000265104 P4
DNAH5ENST00000681290.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.5179T>C p.Leu1727= synonymous_variant 32/79 ENSP00000505288 A1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00746
AC:
1135
AN:
152168
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0257
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00576
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00208
AC:
522
AN:
251452
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00165
AC XY:
224
AN XY:
135892
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0266
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00205
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000703
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000733
AC:
1072
AN:
1461884
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000653
AC XY:
475
AN XY:
727242
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0247
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00239
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000812
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000369
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00139
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00749
AC:
1140
AN:
152286
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00705
AC XY:
525
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0257
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00570
Alfa
AF:
0.00385
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00819
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 10, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 21, 2013Leu1742Leu in exon 32 of DNAH5: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 2.4% (107/4406) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenc ing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs35963491). -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 19, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 21, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
4.9
DANN
Benign
0.62

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35963491; hg19: chr5-13844993; API