rs35985071

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_023036.6(DNAI2):c.234G>A(p.Glu78=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00174 in 1,614,208 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 42 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0093 ( 18 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00095 ( 24 hom. )

Consequence

DNAI2
NM_023036.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.27

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAI2 (HGNC:18744): (dynein axonemal intermediate chain 2) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the dynein intermediate chain family, and is part of the dynein complex of respiratory cilia and sperm flagella. Mutations in this gene are associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia type 9. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

DNAI2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).

BP6

Variant 17-74285090-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-74285090-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 226611.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.27 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00932 (1420/152326) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0325 (1351/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0311. There are 18 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 646 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 18 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
DNAI2	NM_023036.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.234G>A	p.Glu78=	synonymous_variant	3/14	ENST00000311014.11

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
DNAI2	ENST00000311014.11 linkuse as main transcript	c.234G>A	p.Glu78=	synonymous_variant	3/14	1	NM_023036.6	P2	Q9GZS0-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00928

AC:

1412

AN:

152208

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0324

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00347

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00574

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00231

AC:

580

AN:

251400

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00177

AC XY:

241

AN XY:

135880

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0314

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00162

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000704

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000652

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000949

AC:

1388

AN:

1461882

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000839

AC XY:

610

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0322

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00179

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000696

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000656

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00235

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00932

AC:

1420

AN:

152326

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00867

AC XY:

646

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0325

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00347

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00568

Alfa

AF:

0.00405

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0104

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:3

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Natera, Inc.	Dec 04, 2019	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 31, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	May 26, 2015	This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	Feb 21, 2013	Glu78Glu in exon 3 of DNAI2: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 3.0% (134/4406) of Af rican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs35985071). -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 9

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Counsyl	Mar 06, 2017	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	May 06, 2021	See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

7.8

DANN

Benign

0.90

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over