Menu
GeneBe

rs35985071

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_023036.6(DNAI2):c.234G>A(p.Glu78=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00174 in 1,614,208 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 42 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0093 ( 18 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00095 ( 24 hom. )

Consequence

DNAI2
NM_023036.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.27
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAI2 (HGNC:18744): (dynein axonemal intermediate chain 2) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the dynein intermediate chain family, and is part of the dynein complex of respiratory cilia and sperm flagella. Mutations in this gene are associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia type 9. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 17-74285090-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-74285090-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 226611.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.27 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00932 (1420/152326) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0325 (1351/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0311. There are 18 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 646 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 18 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DNAI2NM_023036.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.234G>A p.Glu78= synonymous_variant 3/14 ENST00000311014.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DNAI2ENST00000311014.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.234G>A p.Glu78= synonymous_variant 3/141 NM_023036.6 P2Q9GZS0-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00928
AC:
1412
AN:
152208
Hom.:
18
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0324
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00347
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00574
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00231
AC:
580
AN:
251400
Hom.:
8
AF XY:
0.00177
AC XY:
241
AN XY:
135880
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0314
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00162
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000704
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000652
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000949
AC:
1388
AN:
1461882
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000839
AC XY:
610
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0322
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000696
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000656
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00235
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00932
AC:
1420
AN:
152326
Hom.:
18
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00867
AC XY:
646
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0325
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00347
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00568
Alfa
AF:
0.00405
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.0104
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Dec 04, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 26, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 21, 2013Glu78Glu in exon 3 of DNAI2: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 3.0% (134/4406) of Af rican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs35985071). -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 9 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMar 06, 2017- -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 06, 2021See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
Cadd
Benign
7.8
Dann
Benign
0.90

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35985071; hg19: chr17-72281229; API