rs36031496

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001165963.4(SCN1A):​c.3723T>C​(p.Tyr1241Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00647 in 1,608,278 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 601 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.035 ( 303 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0035 ( 298 hom. )

Consequence

SCN1A
NM_001165963.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.24

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN1A (HGNC:10585): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 1) Voltage-dependent sodium channels are heteromeric complexes that regulate sodium exchange between intracellular and extracellular spaces and are essential for the generation and propagation of action potentials in muscle cells and neurons. Each sodium channel is composed of a large pore-forming, glycosylated alpha subunit and two smaller beta subunits. This gene encodes a sodium channel alpha subunit, which has four homologous domains, each of which contains six transmembrane regions. Allelic variants of this gene are associated with generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures and epileptic encephalopathy. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. The RefSeq Project has decided to create four representative RefSeq records. Three of the transcript variants are supported by experimental evidence and the fourth contains alternate 5' untranslated exons, the exact combination of which have not been experimentally confirmed for the full-length transcript. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
SCN1A-AS1 (HGNC:54069): (SCN1A and SCN9A antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).
BP6
Variant 2-166012265-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-166012265-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 36754.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.24 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.118 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SCN1ANM_001165963.4 linkc.3723T>C p.Tyr1241Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 22 of 29 ENST00000674923.1 NP_001159435.1 P35498-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN1AENST00000674923.1 linkc.3723T>C p.Tyr1241Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 22 of 29 NM_001165963.4 ENSP00000501589.1 P35498-1
SCN1AENST00000303395.9 linkc.3723T>C p.Tyr1241Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 28 5 ENSP00000303540.4 P35498-1
SCN1AENST00000375405.7 linkc.3690T>C p.Tyr1230Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 19 of 26 5 ENSP00000364554.3 P35498-2
SCN1AENST00000409050.2 linkc.3639T>C p.Tyr1213Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 28 5 ENSP00000386312.1 P35498-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0347
AC:
5248
AN:
151236
Hom.:
301
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0128
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000430
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0178
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00904
AC:
2242
AN:
248006
AF XY:
0.00632
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00600
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000100
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00465
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00354
AC:
5155
AN:
1456924
Hom.:
298
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00297
AC XY:
2156
AN XY:
724810
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.123
AC:
4081
AN:
33270
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00721
AC:
320
AN:
44410
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000770
AC:
2
AN:
25958
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39510
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000232
AC:
20
AN:
86068
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000188
AC:
1
AN:
53302
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00732
AC:
42
AN:
5736
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000197
AC:
218
AN:
1108572
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00784
AC:
471
AN:
60098
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.485
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
231
461
692
922
1153
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
130
260
390
520
650
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0347
AC:
5257
AN:
151354
Hom.:
303
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0335
AC XY:
2481
AN XY:
74010
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.121
AC:
4997
AN:
41412
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0127
AC:
192
AN:
15152
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3450
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5154
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000430
AC:
29
AN:
67438
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0176
AC:
37
AN:
2104
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.507
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
241
482
722
963
1204
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
54
108
162
216
270
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0167
Hom.:
88
Bravo
AF:
0.0395
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00722
AC:
25
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Apr 07, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 12, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Sep 07, 2012
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 17, 2021
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Migraine, familial hemiplegic, 3 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
May 09, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 2 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Epilepsy Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy Benign:1
Aug 18, 2011
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.62
CADD
Benign
6.3
DANN
Benign
0.56
PhyloP100
2.2
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs36031496; hg19: chr2-166868775; COSMIC: COSV57683516; COSMIC: COSV57683516; API