rs36210416
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM5BS2
The NM_001148.6(ANK2):c.2122G>A(p.Val708Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000479 in 1,461,334 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as not provided (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V708G) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001148.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- complex neurodevelopmental disorderInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
- Brugada syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen
- catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardiaInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp
- heart conduction diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- neurodevelopmental disorderInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P
- cardiac arrhythmia, ankyrin-B-relatedInheritance: Unknown, AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- long QT syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000479 AC: 7AN: 1461334Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727010 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Torsades de pointes Other:1
This variant has been reported as associated with torsades de pointes in the following publications (PMID:17161064). This is a literature report, and does not necessarily reflect the clinical interpretation of the Imperial College / Royal Brompton Cardiovascular Genetics laboratory. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at