rs367643805

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000393.5(COL5A2):c.3471+8A>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0011 in 1,604,170 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00057 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

COL5A2
NM_000393.5 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.0004781

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.268

Variant links:

Genes affected

COL5A2 (HGNC:2210): (collagen type V alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes an alpha chain for one of the low abundance fibrillar collagens. Fibrillar collagen molecules are trimers that can be composed of one or more types of alpha chains. Type V collagen is found in tissues containing type I collagen and appears to regulate the assembly of heterotypic fibers composed of both type I and type V collagen. This gene product is closely related to type XI collagen and it is possible that the collagen chains of types V and XI constitute a single collagen type with tissue-specific chain combinations. Mutations in this gene are associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, types I and II. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

COL5A2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).

BP6

Variant 2-189043143-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-189043143-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 155778.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=5, Benign=4}. Variant chr2-189043143-T-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000572 (87/152164) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00097 (66/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000782. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 42 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position FAILED quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 87 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL5A2	NM_000393.5 link	c.3471+8A>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 48 of 53	ENST00000374866.9	NP_000384.2	P05997
COL5A2	XM_011510573.4 link	c.3333+8A>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 51 of 56		XP_011508875.1
COL5A2	XM_047443251.1 link	c.3333+8A>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 53 of 58		XP_047299207.1
COL5A2	XM_047443252.1 link	c.3333+8A>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 52 of 57		XP_047299208.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
COL5A2	ENST00000374866.9 link	c.3471+8A>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 48 of 53	1	NM_000393.5	ENSP00000364000.3		P05997
COL5A2	ENST00000618828.1 link	c.2310+8A>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 41 of 46	5		ENSP00000482184.1		A0A087WYX9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000572

AC:

AN:

152164

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000290

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000970

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000532

AC:

132

AN:

248048

AF XY:

0.000627

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000188

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000585

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000929

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000330

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00115

AC:

1672

AN:

1452006

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00113

AC XY:

815

AN XY:

722714

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000300

AC:

AN:

33290

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000900

AC:

AN:

44438

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000385

AC:

AN:

25998

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39648

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

85620

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000375

AC:

AN:

53318

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00146

AC:

1615

AN:

1103862

Gnomad4 Remaining exome

AF:

0.000666

AC:

AN:

60088

Heterozygous variant carriers

166

250

333

416

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

132

198

264

330

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000572

AC:

AN:

152164

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000565

AC XY:

AN XY:

74338

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000290

AC:

0.000289603

AN:

0.000289603

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000262

AC:

0.000261952

AN:

0.000261952

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000970

AC:

0.00097016

AN:

0.00097016

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00239

AC:

0.00239234

AN:

0.00239234

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000915

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000699

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Dec 29, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

COL5A2: BP4, BS1 -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:3

Jun 18, 2014

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 21, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 2

Benign:2

Oct 10, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 7A

Uncertain:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Disproportionate tall stature;C4707243:Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Uncertain:1

Jan 08, 2014

Blueprint Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

Benign:1

Apr 01, 2020

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Connective tissue disorder

Benign:1

Nov 01, 2016

Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.72

CADD

Benign

3.1

DANN

Benign

0.64

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.00048

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.018

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over