rs367864272
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2
The NM_182961.4(SYNE1):āc.20730G>Cā(p.Leu6910=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000545 in 1,613,934 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.00030 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.000029 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
SYNE1
NM_182961.4 synonymous
NM_182961.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.279
Genes affected
SYNE1 (HGNC:17089): (spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope protein 1) This gene encodes a spectrin repeat containing protein expressed in skeletal and smooth muscle, and peripheral blood lymphocytes, that localizes to the nuclear membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 8, also referred to as autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 1 or recessive ataxia of Beauce. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.36).
BP6
Variant 6-152232248-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-152232248-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 355838.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.279 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 46 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNE1 | NM_182961.4 | c.20730G>C | p.Leu6910= | synonymous_variant | 113/146 | ENST00000367255.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNE1 | ENST00000367255.10 | c.20730G>C | p.Leu6910= | synonymous_variant | 113/146 | 1 | NM_182961.4 | P1 | |
SYNE1 | ENST00000423061.6 | c.20517G>C | p.Leu6839= | synonymous_variant | 112/146 | 1 | |||
SYNE1 | ENST00000367256.9 | n.4422G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 28/61 | 1 | ||||
SYNE1 | ENST00000409694.6 | n.4314G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 26/59 | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000296 AC: 45AN: 152154Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
45
AN:
152154
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000103 AC: 26AN: 251348Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000809 AC XY: 11AN XY: 135890
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
26
AN:
251348
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
135890
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000287 AC: 42AN: 1461662Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000330 AC XY: 24AN XY: 727128
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
42
AN:
1461662
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
727128
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000302 AC: 46AN: 152272Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000282 AC XY: 21AN XY: 74470
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
46
AN:
152272
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
21
AN XY:
74470
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 16, 2018 | - - |
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type;C2751807:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 14, 2022 | - - |
Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at