rs368178771
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 1P and 11B. PP2BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The NM_016169.4(SUFU):āc.1045A>Gā(p.Ser349Gly) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000762 in 1,614,034 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.000079 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š: 0.000076 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
SUFU
NM_016169.4 missense
NM_016169.4 missense
Scores
6
13
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.15
Genes affected
SUFU (HGNC:16466): (SUFU negative regulator of hedgehog signaling) The Hedgehog signaling pathway plays an important role in early human development. The pathway is a signaling cascade that plays a role in pattern formation and cellular proliferation during development. This gene encodes a negative regulator of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Defects in this gene are a cause of medulloblastoma. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, May 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), SUFU. . Gene score misZ 1.9341 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 3.1202 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with apraxia, ciliopathy, ocular motor apraxia, Cogan type, nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome, Joubert syndrome, Joubert syndrome 32, medulloblastoma.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.21711054).
BP6
Variant 10-102615290-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-102615290-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 135283.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=4, not_provided=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000789 (12/152144) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000162 (11/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000905. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 6 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 12 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUFU | NM_016169.4 | c.1045A>G | p.Ser349Gly | missense_variant | 9/12 | ENST00000369902.8 | NP_057253.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUFU | ENST00000369902.8 | c.1045A>G | p.Ser349Gly | missense_variant | 9/12 | 1 | NM_016169.4 | ENSP00000358918.4 | ||
SUFU | ENST00000423559.2 | c.1045A>G | p.Ser349Gly | missense_variant | 9/10 | 1 | ENSP00000411597.2 | |||
SUFU | ENST00000369899.6 | c.1045A>G | p.Ser349Gly | missense_variant | 9/11 | 1 | ENSP00000358915.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
12
AN:
152144
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000398 AC: 10AN: 251474Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135918
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
251474
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135918
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000759 AC: 111AN: 1461890Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000646 AC XY: 47AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
111
AN:
1461890
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
47
AN XY:
727248
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74304
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
12
AN:
152144
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74304
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
AC:
7
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:2Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 17, 2022 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Identified in healthy individuals undergoing whole genome sequencing (Bodian 2014); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24311597, 24728327) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 24, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 15, 2024 | The SUFU c.1045A>G (p.Ser349Gly) variant has been observed in a reportedly healthy individual (PMID: 24728327 (2014)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000085 (11/129172 chromosomes in European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is deleterious or benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Familial meningioma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Mar 15, 2024 | - - |
Gorlin syndrome;C0025149:Medulloblastoma;C3551915:Familial meningioma;C4540342:Joubert syndrome 32 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
Gorlin syndrome;C0025149:Medulloblastoma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 19, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 23, 2023 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;L;L
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T
Polyphen
P;P;P
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at