rs368240967
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP4
The NM_001330078.2(NRXN1):c.811G>A(p.Gly271Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000745 in 1,610,132 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G271R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001330078.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRXN1 | NM_001330078.2 | c.811G>A | p.Gly271Ser | missense_variant | 4/23 | ENST00000401669.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRXN1 | ENST00000401669.7 | c.811G>A | p.Gly271Ser | missense_variant | 4/23 | 5 | NM_001330078.2 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000396 AC: 6AN: 151638Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000122 AC: 3AN: 245002Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000753 AC XY: 1AN XY: 132784
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000782 AC: 114AN: 1458494Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000717 AC XY: 52AN XY: 725374
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000396 AC: 6AN: 151638Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000540 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74020
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome 2 Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 27, 2023 | This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 304 of the NRXN1 protein (p.Gly304Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs368240967, gnomAD 0.003%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with NRXN1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 583089). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Feb 04, 2019 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 09, 2019 | Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016) - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at