rs368309229

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_000368.5(TSC1):c.2209-3T>C variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000067 in 1,613,092 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000060 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TSC1
NM_000368.5 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.000009270

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.02

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

COSMIC-nc: COSV105880808

Genes affected

TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TSC1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

tuberous sclerosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
tuberous sclerosis 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
lung lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
tuberous sclerosis complex
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

TSC1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).

BP6

Variant 9-132902790-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132902790-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 365516.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 20 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TSC1	NM_000368.5 link	c.2209-3T>C		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 17 of 22	ENST00000298552.9	NP_000359.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TSC1	ENST00000298552.9 link	c.2209-3T>C		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 17 of 22	1	NM_000368.5	ENSP00000298552.3
TSC1	ENST00000490179.4 link	c.2209-3T>C		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 18 of 23	3		ENSP00000495533.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

152198

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000283

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000206

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000637

AC:

AN:

251088

AF XY:

0.0000442

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000231

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000705

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000602

AC:

AN:

1460894

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000633

AC XY:

AN XY:

726748

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000269

AC:

AN:

33452

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86202

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000431

AC:

AN:

53390

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4976

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000351

AC:

AN:

1111996

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000265

AC:

AN:

60318

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.478

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

152198

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74352

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000724

AC:

AN:

41448

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15282

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5200

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000283

AC:

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000206

AC:

AN:

68036

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.505

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000267

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000604

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tuberous sclerosis 1

Uncertain:2Benign:3

Nov 07, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 24, 2025

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Jul 05, 2024

Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Dec 29, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

Feb 28, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified

Benign:1

Feb 16, 2025

Laboratory of Genetics, Children's Clinical University Hospital Latvia

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 29, 2024

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Aug 19, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.45

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.90

PhyloP100

2.0

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.0000093

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.010

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over