rs368486366
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000535.7(PMS2):c.705+12C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000105 in 1,613,292 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000535.7 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Lynch syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- Lynch syndrome 4Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- mismatch repair cancer syndrome 4Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- malignant pancreatic neoplasmInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- Muir-Torre syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- rhabdomyosarcomaInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- breast cancerInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- prostate cancerInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152018Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 251484 AF XY: 0.0000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000821 AC: 12AN: 1461274Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 726994 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152018Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74260 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
The PMS2 c.705+12C>T variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs368486366) as "With Likely benign allele" and ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx; as likely benign by Color). The variant was identified in control databases in 6 of 246260 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 4 of 15304 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003, increasing the likelihood that this could be a low frequency benign variant) and Latino in 2 of 33582 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006), while it was not observed in the Other, European, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at