Menu
GeneBe

rs368486676

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.1017-9T>C variant causes a splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000514 in 1,614,104 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000079 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000049 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.77
Variant links:
Genes affected
WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.19).
BP6
Variant 11-32400053-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32400053-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 414075.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=1}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 12 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
WT1NM_024426.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1017-9T>C splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant ENST00000452863.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
WT1ENST00000452863.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1017-9T>C splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_024426.6 P19544-7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000789
AC:
12
AN:
152168
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00174
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000147
AC:
37
AN:
251208
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000155
AC XY:
21
AN XY:
135772
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000616
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00125
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000486
AC:
71
AN:
1461818
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000591
AC XY:
43
AN XY:
727192
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000605
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000383
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000215
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000788
AC:
12
AN:
152286
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000940
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00174
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000604
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00260
AC:
9
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Wilms tumor 1 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthDec 01, 2023- -
Nephrotic syndrome, type 4 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 25, 2024- -
Meacham syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.19
Cadd
Benign
18
Dann
Benign
0.79

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs368486676; hg19: chr11-32421599; API