rs368865502

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):​c.4807C>T​(p.Leu1603Leu) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000103 in 1,613,968 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MYO15A
NM_016239.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.99
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.31).
BP6
Variant 17-18137611-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-18137611-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 504631.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYO15ANM_016239.4 linkc.4807C>T p.Leu1603Leu synonymous_variant Exon 16 of 66 ENST00000647165.2 NP_057323.3 Q9UKN7-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO15AENST00000647165.2 linkc.4807C>T p.Leu1603Leu synonymous_variant Exon 16 of 66 NM_016239.4 ENSP00000495481.1 Q9UKN7-1
MYO15AENST00000646238.1 linkn.-230C>T upstream_gene_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000723
AC:
11
AN:
152242
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000100
AC:
25
AN:
249440
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000103
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
135356
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000646
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000556
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000203
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000106
AC:
155
AN:
1461726
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000118
AC XY:
86
AN XY:
727160
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000133
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000828
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000723
AC:
11
AN:
152242
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74374
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000135
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000642
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Oct 07, 2024
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis indicates that this variant does not alter splicing; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Feb 01, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1
Apr 30, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Leu1603Leu in exon 16 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 15/66284 Europ ean chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinst itute.org; dbSNP rs368865502). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.31
CADD
Benign
9.1
DANN
Benign
0.75

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.14
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs368865502; hg19: chr17-18040925; API