rs368959759

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_000079.4(CHRNA1):​c.1002+9G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000912 in 1,612,602 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000090 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CHRNA1
NM_000079.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -5.34

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHRNA1 (HGNC:1955): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 1 subunit) The muscle acetylcholine receptor consiststs of 5 subunits of 4 different types: 2 alpha subunits and 1 each of the beta, gamma, and delta subunits. This gene encodes an alpha subunit that plays a role in acetlycholine binding/channel gating. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2012]
CHRNA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • congenital myasthenic syndrome 1A
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • lethal multiple pterygium syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P
  • myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 1B, fast-channel
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia
  • postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant 2-174749937-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-174749937-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 332441.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CHRNA1NM_000079.4 linkc.1002+9G>A intron_variant Intron 7 of 8 ENST00000348749.9 NP_000070.1
CHRNA1NM_001039523.3 linkc.1077+9G>A intron_variant Intron 8 of 9 NP_001034612.1
CHRNA1XM_017003256.2 linkc.1098+9G>A intron_variant Intron 7 of 8 XP_016858745.1
CHRNA1XM_017003257.2 linkc.1023+9G>A intron_variant Intron 6 of 7 XP_016858746.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CHRNA1ENST00000348749.9 linkc.1002+9G>A intron_variant Intron 7 of 8 1 NM_000079.4 ENSP00000261008.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000986
AC:
15
AN:
152142
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000244
AC:
61
AN:
249936
AF XY:
0.000222
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000290
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00518
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000444
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000492
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000904
AC:
132
AN:
1460460
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000908
AC XY:
66
AN XY:
726636
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000299
AC:
1
AN:
33448
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000224
AC:
1
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00371
AC:
97
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39690
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86110
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53370
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000178
AC:
1
AN:
5614
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000153
AC:
17
AN:
1111064
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000249
AC:
15
AN:
60326
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.489
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
7
14
22
29
36
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000986
AC:
15
AN:
152142
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000673
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74328
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41410
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000655
AC:
1
AN:
15266
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5200
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000735
AC:
5
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000956
AC:
2
AN:
2092
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000329
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000110
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Lethal multiple pterygium syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Dec 24, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

Congenital myasthenic syndrome Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

CHRNA1-related disorder Benign:1
Apr 29, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.88
CADD
Benign
0.088
DANN
Benign
0.85
PhyloP100
-5.3
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs368959759; hg19: chr2-175614665; API