rs369383272
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6BP7
The NM_000057.4(BLM):c.3828G>A(p.Ala1276=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000188 in 1,614,066 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BLM
NM_000057.4 synonymous
NM_000057.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.192
Genes affected
BLM (HGNC:1058): (BLM RecQ like helicase) The Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth deficiency, microcephaly and immunodeficiency among others. It is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding DNA helicase RecQ protein on chromosome 15q26. This Bloom-associated helicase unwinds a variety of DNA substrates including Holliday junction, and is involved in several pathways contributing to the maintenance of genome stability. Identification of pathogenic Bloom variants is required for heterozygote testing in at-risk families. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).
BP6
Variant 15-90809213-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-90809213-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 405304.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr15-90809213-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.192 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | NM_000057.4 | c.3828G>A | p.Ala1276= | synonymous_variant | 20/22 | ENST00000355112.8 | NP_000048.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | ENST00000355112.8 | c.3828G>A | p.Ala1276= | synonymous_variant | 20/22 | 1 | NM_000057.4 | ENSP00000347232 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
18
AN:
152180
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000111 AC: 28AN: 251474Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000125 AC XY: 17AN XY: 135912
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
251474
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
135912
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000195 AC: 285AN: 1461886Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000186 AC XY: 135AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
285
AN:
1461886
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
135
AN XY:
727244
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000673 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74340
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
18
AN:
152180
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74340
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Bloom syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | May 31, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Nov 06, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 08, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 27, 2019 | - - |
BLM-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 03, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at