rs369429961

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_017780.4(CHD7):c.2751G>A(p.Thr917Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000627 in 1,590,562 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00038 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00065 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CHD7
NM_017780.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.52

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CHD7 (HGNC:20626): (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7) This gene encodes a protein that contains several helicase family domains. Mutations in this gene have been found in some patients with the CHARGE syndrome. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

CHD7 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

CHARGE syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, ClinGen, G2P
hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
hypogonadotropic hypogonadism
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Kallmann syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Omenn syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CHD7 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).

BP6

Variant 8-60821843-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-60821843-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 193725.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.52 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000381 (58/152072) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000691 (47/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000534. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 23 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CHD7	NM_017780.4 link	c.2751G>A	p.Thr917Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 38	ENST00000423902.7	NP_060250.2	Q9P2D1-1Q6ZWF9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CHD7	ENST00000423902.7 link	c.2751G>A	p.Thr917Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 38	5	NM_017780.4	ENSP00000392028.1	Q9P2D1-1
CHD7	ENST00000524602.5 link	c.1717-40386G>A		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 4	1		ENSP00000437061.1	Q9P2D1-4
CHD7	ENST00000525508.1 link	c.2751G>A	p.Thr917Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 12	5		ENSP00000436027.1	Q9P2D1-2
CHD7	ENST00000695853.1 link	n.2751G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 10 of 37			ENSP00000512218.1	A0A8Q3WKT9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000381

AC:

AN:

152072

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000169

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000691

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000369

AC:

AN:

214354

AF XY:

0.000321

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000778

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000368

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000634

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000734

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000653

AC:

940

AN:

1438490

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000627

AC XY:

447

AN XY:

713300

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000182

AC:

AN:

33038

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000346

AC:

AN:

40450

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25710

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000774

AC:

AN:

38774

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000723

AC:

AN:

82954

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52230

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000522

AC:

AN:

5748

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000798

AC:

878

AN:

1099886

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000503

AC:

AN:

59700

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.479

Heterozygous variant carriers

142

190

237

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

114

152

190

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000381

AC:

AN:

152072

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000310

AC XY:

AN XY:

74272

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000169

AC:

AN:

41394

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000262

AC:

AN:

15264

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5198

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4820

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10588

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000691

AC:

AN:

68026

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2084

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.515

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000654

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000366

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:5

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 14, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

CHD7: BP4, BP7 -

Aug 05, 2019

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28475860) -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Dec 03, 2019

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

CHARGE syndrome

Benign:1

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Jun 29, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.84

CADD

Benign

0.39

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.83

PhyloP100

-1.5

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=85/15

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over