rs369581851
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The ENST00000378823.8(RAD50):c.3165-8T>G variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000301 in 1,610,600 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000378823.8 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD50 | NM_005732.4 | c.3165-8T>G | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000378823.8 | NP_005723.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD50 | ENST00000378823.8 | c.3165-8T>G | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_005732.4 | ENSP00000368100 | P1 | |||
RAD50 | ENST00000533482.5 | c.*2791-8T>G | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 1 | ENSP00000431225 | |||||
RAD50 | ENST00000651249.1 | upstream_gene_variant | ENSP00000498257 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00175 AC: 267AN: 152228Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000456 AC: 114AN: 250218Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000339 AC XY: 46AN XY: 135614
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000149 AC: 218AN: 1458254Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000119 AC XY: 86AN XY: 725602
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00175 AC: 267AN: 152346Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00168 AC XY: 125AN XY: 74512
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jul 02, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 08, 2019 | Variant summary: RAD50 c.3165-8T>G alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00056 in 276852 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The observed variant frequency is approximately 9 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RAD50 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer phenotype (6.3e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.3165-8T>G in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Apr 01, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Apr 12, 2018 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 26, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at