rs369653963
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_006302.3(MOGS):āc.85C>Gā(p.Arg29Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000496 in 1,530,734 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006302.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOGS | NM_006302.3 | c.85C>G | p.Arg29Gly | missense_variant | 1/4 | ENST00000448666.7 | NP_006293.2 | |
MOGS | NM_001146158.2 | c.-59+151C>G | intron_variant | NP_001139630.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOGS | ENST00000448666.7 | c.85C>G | p.Arg29Gly | missense_variant | 1/4 | 1 | NM_006302.3 | ENSP00000410992 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000638 AC: 97AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00130 AC: 165AN: 126576Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00104 AC XY: 73AN XY: 69878
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000480 AC: 661AN: 1378472Hom.: 6 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000458 AC XY: 312AN XY: 680504
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000644 AC: 98AN: 152262Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000672 AC XY: 50AN XY: 74450
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
MOGS-congenital disorder of glycosylation Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 03, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 03, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
MOGS-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 09, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2023 | MOGS: BS1 - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at