rs369711772

Positions:

chr15-38351292-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_152594.3(SPRED1):c.963G>A(p.Lys321=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000198 in 1,613,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SPRED1
NM_152594.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.94

Variant links:

Genes affected

SPRED1 (HGNC:20249): (sprouty related EVH1 domain containing 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the Sprouty family of proteins and is phosphorylated by tyrosine kinase in response to several growth factors. The encoded protein can act as a homodimer or as a heterodimer with SPRED2 to regulate activation of the MAP kinase cascade. Defects in this gene are a cause of neurofibromatosis type 1-like syndrome (NFLS). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

SPRED1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).

BP6

Variant 15-38351292-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-38351292-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 315737.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=1}. Variant chr15-38351292-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.94 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000208 (304/1461812) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000257 (286/1111992). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000232. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 147 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 16 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
SPRED1	NM_152594.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.963G>A	p.Lys321=	synonymous_variant	7/7	ENST00000299084.9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
SPRED1	ENST00000299084.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.963G>A	p.Lys321=	synonymous_variant	7/7	1	NM_152594.3	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000105

AC:

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000191

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

251024

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000147

AC XY:

AN XY:

135660

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000282

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000208

AC:

304

AN:

1461812

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000202

AC XY:

147

AN XY:

727196

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000257

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000265

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000105

AC:

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000121

AC XY:

AN XY:

74330

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000191

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000983

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000106

EpiCase

AF:

0.000327

EpiControl

AF:

0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Legius syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 31, 2024	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Nov 01, 2017

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Dec 23, 2019

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

May 17, 2018

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Mar 16, 2022

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.45

CADD

Benign

5.4

DANN

Benign

0.60

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over