rs369775705
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000367255.10(SYNE1):c.4610G>A(p.Arg1537Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000941 in 1,614,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1537G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000367255.10 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNE1 | NM_182961.4 | c.4610G>A | p.Arg1537Gln | missense_variant | 35/146 | ENST00000367255.10 | NP_892006.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNE1 | ENST00000367255.10 | c.4610G>A | p.Arg1537Gln | missense_variant | 35/146 | 1 | NM_182961.4 | ENSP00000356224 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000657 AC: 100AN: 152130Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00192 AC: 483AN: 251334Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.00246 AC XY: 334AN XY: 135816
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000971 AC: 1419AN: 1461830Hom.: 22 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00139 AC XY: 1013AN XY: 727218
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000657 AC: 100AN: 152248Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00105 AC XY: 78AN XY: 74450
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 05, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Oct 26, 2020 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 09, 2019 | - - |
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type;C2751807:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at