rs369964781
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4BS2
The NM_014008.5(CCDC22):c.1135C>T(p.Arg379Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000914 in 1,203,164 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 3 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014008.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC22 | NM_014008.5 | c.1135C>T | p.Arg379Cys | missense_variant | 10/17 | ENST00000376227.4 | NP_054727.1 | |
CCDC22 | XM_005272599.5 | c.1132C>T | p.Arg378Cys | missense_variant | 10/17 | XP_005272656.1 | ||
CCDC22 | XR_430506.4 | n.1298C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC22 | ENST00000376227.4 | c.1135C>T | p.Arg379Cys | missense_variant | 10/17 | 1 | NM_014008.5 | ENSP00000365401 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000906 AC: 1AN: 110383Hom.: 0 Cov.: 21 AF XY: 0.0000306 AC XY: 1AN XY: 32695
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000173 AC: 3AN: 173517Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 62931
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000915 AC: 10AN: 1092781Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000554 AC XY: 2AN XY: 360923
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000906 AC: 1AN: 110383Hom.: 0 Cov.: 21 AF XY: 0.0000306 AC XY: 1AN XY: 32695
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Mar 28, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at