rs370091178
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.6060C>T(p.Ala2020Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000221 in 1,586,364 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016239.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000164 AC: 25AN: 152234Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000142 AC: 29AN: 203994 AF XY: 0.000154 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000227 AC: 325AN: 1434130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.000236 AC XY: 168AN XY: 710676 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000164 AC: 25AN: 152234Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000175 AC XY: 13AN XY: 74368 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
p.Ala2020Ala in Exon 28 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 7/ 22590 of Europ ean (Non-Finnish) chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http:// exac.broadinstitute.org/). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at