Variant rs370160994 details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BS2_SupportingBA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The allele frequency of the p.Val168= variant in TCF4 is 0.057% in European (Non-Finnish) sub population in gnomAD, which is high enough to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like conditions (BA1). The p.Val168= variant is observed in 1 unaffected individual (Baylor Genetics internal database) (BS2_supporting). In summary, p.Val168= variant in TCF4 is classified as benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria (BA1, BS2_supporting). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA293878/MONDO:0012589/016

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00035 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00049 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

TCF4
NM_001083962.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.19

Variant links:

Genes affected

TCF4 (HGNC:11634): (transcription factor 4) This gene encodes transcription factor 4, a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor. The encoded protein recognizes an Ephrussi-box ('E-box') binding site ('CANNTG') - a motif first identified in immunoglobulin enhancers. This gene is broadly expressed, and may play an important role in nervous system development. Defects in this gene are a cause of Pitt-Hopkins syndrome. In addition, an intronic CTG repeat normally numbering 10-37 repeat units can expand to >50 repeat units and cause Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants that encode different proteins have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2016]

TCF4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BS2

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

BA1

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TCF4	NM_001083962.2 link	c.504A>G	p.Val168Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 20	ENST00000354452.8	NP_001077431.1	P15884-3B3KVA4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TCF4	ENST00000354452.8 link	c.504A>G	p.Val168Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 20	5	NM_001083962.2	ENSP00000346440.3		P15884-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000348

AC:

AN:

152192

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000338

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000544

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000319

AC:

AN:

250828

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000339

AC XY:

AN XY:

135544

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000246

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000463

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000591

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000491

AC:

718

AN:

1461288

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000498

AC XY:

362

AN XY:

726948

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000598

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000112

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000937

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000613

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000249

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000348

AC:

AN:

152192

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000363

AC XY:

AN XY:

74354

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000338

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000544

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000687

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000355

EpiCase

AF:

0.000273

EpiControl

AF:

0.000534

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Apr 24, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

TCF4: BP4, BP7 -

not specified

Benign:2

Nov 18, 2015

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 06, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Pitt-Hopkins syndrome

Benign:2

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 18, 2022

ClinGen Rett and Angelman-like Disorders Variant Curation Expert Panel

Significance: Benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

The allele frequency of the p.Val168= variant in TCF4 is 0.057% in European (Non-Finnish) sub population in gnomAD, which is high enough to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like conditions (BA1). The p.Val168= variant is observed in 1 unaffected individual (Baylor Genetics internal database) (BS2_supporting). In summary, p.Val168= variant in TCF4 is classified as benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria (BA1, BS2_supporting). -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Jan 24, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

TCF4-related disorder

Benign:1

Nov 04, 2021

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.54

CADD

Benign

3.0

DANN

Benign

0.71

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over